Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Fast dual graph-based hotspot detection
Author(s): Andrew B. Kahng; Chul-Hong Park; Xu Xu
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

As advanced technologies in wafer manufacturing push patterning processes toward lower-k1 subwavelength printing, lithography for mass production potentially suffers from decreased patterning fidelity. This results in generation of many hotspots, which are actual device patterns with relatively large CD and image errors with respect to on-wafer targets. Hotspots can be formed under a variety of conditions such as the original design being unfriendly to the RET that is applied, unanticipated pattern combinations in rule-based OPC, or inaccuracies in model-based OPC. When these hotspots fall on locations that are critical to the electrical performance of a device, device performance and parametric yield can be significantly degraded. Previous rule-based hotspot detection methods suffer from long runtimes for complicated patterns. Also, the model generation process that captures process variation within simulation-based approaches brings significant overheads in terms of validation, measurement and parameter calibration. In this paper, we first describe a novel detection algorithm for hotspots induced by lithographic uncertainty. Our goal is to rapidly detect all lithographic hotspots without significant accuracy degradation. In other words, we propose a filtering method: as long as there are no "false negatives", i.e., we successfully have a superset of actual hotspots, then our method can dramatically reduce the layout area for golden hotspot analysis. The first step of our hotspot detection algorithm is to build a layout graph which reflects pattern-related CD variation. Given a layout L, the layout graph G = (V, Ec union Ep) consists of nodes V, corner edges Ec and proximity edges Ep. A face in the layout graph includes several close features and the edges between them. Edge weight can be calculated from a traditional 2-D model or a lookup table. We then apply a three-level hotspot detection: (1) edge-level detection finds the hotspot caused by two close features or "L-shaped" features; (2) face-level detection finds the pattern-related hotspots which span several close features; and (3) merged-face-level detection finds hotspots with more complex patterns. To find the merged faces which capture the pattern-related hotspots, we propose to convert the layout into a planar graph G. We then construct its dual graph GD and sort the dual nodes according to their weights. We merge the sorted dual nodes (i.e., the faces in G) that share a given feature, in sequence. We have tested our flow on several industry testcases. The experimental results show that our method is promising: for a 90nm metal layer with 17 hotspots detected by commercial optical rule check (ORC) tools, our method can detect all of them while the overall runtime improvement is more than 287X.

Paper Details

Date Published: 20 October 2006
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 6349, Photomask Technology 2006, 63490H (20 October 2006); doi: 10.1117/12.692949
Show Author Affiliations
Andrew B. Kahng, Univ. of California, San Diego (United States)
Blaze DFM, Inc. (United States)
Chul-Hong Park, Univ. of California, San Diego (United States)
Xu Xu, Univ. of California, San Diego (United States)
Blaze DFM, Inc. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 6349:
Photomask Technology 2006
Patrick M. Martin; Robert J. Naber, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?