
Proceedings Paper
Shearography versus Holography in Nondestructive EvaluationFormat | Member Price | Non-Member Price |
---|---|---|
$17.00 | $21.00 |
Paper Abstract
The demands for greater product quality and product reliability has created a need for better techniques of nondestructive evaluation. Each of the available techniques including ultrasonic, acoustical emissions, radiography, thermography, magnetic particles, eddy current, dye penetrant, and optical methods such as holography and shearography has its unique advantages and disadvantages. The selection of one technique depends on the particular objective of the evaluation. When selecting a technique, it is important to have a sound knowledge of the capabilities as well as limitations of each technique. This paper will give a thorough review of two major optical methods of nondestructive testing: holography and shearography.
Paper Details
Date Published: 1 January 1986
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 0604, Holographic Nondestructive Testing, (1 January 1986); doi: 10.1117/12.966610
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 0604:
Holographic Nondestructive Testing
Charles M. Vest, Editor(s)
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 0604, Holographic Nondestructive Testing, (1 January 1986); doi: 10.1117/12.966610
Show Author Affiliations
Y. Y. Hung, Oakland University (United States)
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 0604:
Holographic Nondestructive Testing
Charles M. Vest, Editor(s)
© SPIE. Terms of Use
