Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Comparison Of Acousto-Electric And Acousto-Optic Signal Processing Devices
Author(s): R. A. Becker; S. A. Reible; R. W. Ralston
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

Developers of surface-wave acoustooptic (AO) and acoustoelectric (AE) devices are currently competing with one another by conducting feasibility demonstrations which suggest substantial analog signal-processing capabilities. The development of one AE surface-acoustic-wave device, a wideband convolver, is currently in a more advanced state in terms of system-worthiness than are AO and other AE devices. However, in terms of future potential in most systems applications, it has not been apparent whether either class of devices has had a clear advantage. In this paper, figures of merit as well as design tradeoffs in the two technologies are compared. These comparisons focus on those areas of the competing technologies which will be most stressed as the devices become system-worthy components in the near future. Projections are made for the realization of practical devices capable of providing, with adequate dynamic range, the signal-processing gains suggested by the feasibility demonstrations. It is concluded that each system application must be considered individually to determine whether AE or AO devices are the most advantageous.

Paper Details

Date Published: 29 February 1980
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 0209, Optical Signal Processing for C3I, (29 February 1980); doi: 10.1117/12.958301
Show Author Affiliations
R. A. Becker, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (United States)
S. A. Reible, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (United States)
R. W. Ralston, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 0209:
Optical Signal Processing for C3I
William J. Miceli, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?