Proceedings Paper
A comparison and reflection of open online course quality status between China and UK| Format | Member Price | Non-Member Price |
|---|---|---|
| $17.00 | $21.00 |
Paper Abstract
Quality is a significant factor in the application and sustainable development of Open Online Course Resources. To
analyze course quality, 102 courses were randomly selected: 51 from the Open University's OpenLearn (OL) program in
the UK and 51 from the National Essential Online Courses (NEOC) program in China. These courses were evaluated by
applying the Online Course Perceived Quality Evaluation Model (OCPQEM) in order to compare NEOC and OL in
terms of Learning Resources and Learning Processes from the perspective of student users. Suggestions are proposed to
improve the learning resources, user interface, learning guides, and user interaction.
Paper Details
Date Published: 13 January 2012
PDF: 6 pages
Proc. SPIE 8350, Fourth International Conference on Machine Vision (ICMV 2011): Computer Vision and Image Analysis; Pattern Recognition and Basic Technologies, 83502P (13 January 2012); doi: 10.1117/12.920260
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8350:
Fourth International Conference on Machine Vision (ICMV 2011): Computer Vision and Image Analysis; Pattern Recognition and Basic Technologies
Safaa S. Mahmoud; Zhu Zeng; Yuting Li, Editor(s)
PDF: 6 pages
Proc. SPIE 8350, Fourth International Conference on Machine Vision (ICMV 2011): Computer Vision and Image Analysis; Pattern Recognition and Basic Technologies, 83502P (13 January 2012); doi: 10.1117/12.920260
Show Author Affiliations
Zehui Zhan, South China Normal Univ. (China)
Hu Mei, South China Normal Univ. (China)
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8350:
Fourth International Conference on Machine Vision (ICMV 2011): Computer Vision and Image Analysis; Pattern Recognition and Basic Technologies
Safaa S. Mahmoud; Zhu Zeng; Yuting Li, Editor(s)
© SPIE. Terms of Use
