Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Litho1-litho2 proximity differences for LELE and LPLE double patterning processes
Author(s): Patrick Wong; Peter De Bisschop; Stewart Robertson; Nadia Vandenbroeck; John Biafore; Vincent Wiaux; Jeroen Van de Kerkhove
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

Double Patterning (DP) is the most immediate lithography candidate for IC technologies requiring pitches below the single exposure capabilities of today's ArF immersion scanners. Litho-Process-Litho-Etch (LPLE) double patterning (DP) processes potentially offer substantial cost and throughput benefits over the more proven Litho-Etch-Litho-Etch (LELE) approaches. However, LPLE DP approaches typically use a different resist for each lithography step and there are many potential process and material interactions between the lithographic layers which could have an impact on proximity effects after full DP flow. In this work the impact of process and material interactions on proximity effects is investigated for a metal 1 double trench LELE process and a poly double line LPLE process. The process windows for several pitches and proximity behaviour of both pattern 1 and pattern 2 is studied. Results obtained from a single patterned wafer are compared with results from a single patterned and double patterned area on a double patterned wafer. The results reveal that for the LPLE case there are process window and proximity differences between single and double patterned wafers showing the influence of a neighbouring line from another patterning step. The process window differences do not just consist of a simple shift along the dose axis. For a few specific cases the experimental results are compared to calibrated LPL Prolith model predictions. The Prolith simulation model matches the experimental data and helps to distinguish between chemical, optical and processing effects as the root cause of the observed differences.

Paper Details

Date Published: 13 March 2012
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 8326, Optical Microlithography XXV, 83260E (13 March 2012); doi: 10.1117/12.916156
Show Author Affiliations
Patrick Wong, IMEC (Belgium)
Peter De Bisschop, IMEC (Belgium)
Stewart Robertson, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Nadia Vandenbroeck, IMEC (Belgium)
John Biafore, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Vincent Wiaux, IMEC (Belgium)
Jeroen Van de Kerkhove, IMEC (Belgium)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8326:
Optical Microlithography XXV
Will Conley, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?