Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

The effect of breast positioning on breast compression in mammography: a pressure distribution perspective
Author(s): Magnus Dustler; Ingvar Andersson; Daniel Förnvik; Anders Tingberg
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

The standard procedure at mammography is to compress the breast in order to improve image quality, better separate tissue components and reduce absorbed dose to the breast. Traditionally, compression guidelines have been based on applied force, rather than actual thickness reduction. Structures such as the pectoral muscle are stiffer than breast tissue and if compressed along with it, as in the MLO-projection, might absorb much of the applied force. This study investigated the difference in compression of breasts before and after they were repositioned to exclude 1 cm of the juxtathoracic part. Twenty-one women were included in the study. The distribution of compression pressure was measured using thin FSR (Force Sensing Resistor) pressure sensors attached to the compression paddle. Breast thickness and compression force were measured by the mammographic device. Compared to standard positioning the repositioned breasts were thinner by 4.4±2.3 mm (P < 0.001) (from 50.3 mm to 45.9 mm) and had a 12.3±24.5 cm2 (P = 0.032) larger area over which pressure was distributed (from 97.6 cm2 to 109.9 cm2), despite less of the breast being included in the projection. This indicates that the inclusion of the pectoral muscle and other juxtathoracic structures in the MLOprojection substantially affects pressure distribution and prevents proper compression of the breast. The results suggest that the exact positioning of the MLO-projection should be carefully evaluated in order to find a balance between breast compression and tissue inclusion.

Paper Details

Date Published: 3 March 2012
PDF: 6 pages
Proc. SPIE 8313, Medical Imaging 2012: Physics of Medical Imaging, 83134M (3 March 2012); doi: 10.1117/12.905746
Show Author Affiliations
Magnus Dustler, Lund Univ. (Sweden)
Ingvar Andersson, Skåne Univ. Hospital (Sweden)
Daniel Förnvik, Lund Univ. (Sweden)
Anders Tingberg, Lund Univ. (Sweden)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8313:
Medical Imaging 2012: Physics of Medical Imaging
Norbert J. Pelc; Robert M. Nishikawa; Bruce R. Whiting, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?