Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Comparison of clear-field and dark-field images with optimized masks
Author(s): Robert Sinn; Thuc Dam; Bob Gleason
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

Clear-field photo-masks offer significant advantages over dark-field photo-masks for some important classes of target patterns, including small isolated features and dense arrays of contacts. This work compares lithographic performance of clear-field and dark-field images when mask patterns are optimized for respective mask tones. Since the purpose is to study optical behavior, computed images without resist models were compared. In order to explore performance limits, optimized masks were not constrained to limit their complexity. Calculated images were compared for clear-field and dark-field masks, with either opaque or 6% transmission, 180-degree phase-shifted absorbers. In each case, mask patterns were independently optimized to print the targets, which were a set of square and rectangular arrays of contact holes with various dimensions and pitches. The range of the target patterns extended to the limits of ArF resolution with water immersion. Because the intent was to compare inherent optical performance of positive and negative-tone imaging, the study did not use resist models that would combine materials properties or behaviors into the results, but simply applied a constant threshold to calculated intensities to obtain images. Contrast, MEEF, and deviation of images with defocus were the basis of optimizing the mask patterns, and were compared for the four combinations of mask tones and absorbers. Best contrast and MEEF were obtained with bright-field masks that had attenuated, phase-shifting absorbers. The amount of improvement depended on the size of the mask patterns relative to that of their corresponding targets, set here by varying the intensity threshold for the images during mask optimization. Differences in how the images of the four types of masks changed with defocus were statistically insignificant.

Paper Details

Date Published: 22 March 2011
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 7973, Optical Microlithography XXIV, 79731V (22 March 2011); doi: 10.1117/12.879533
Show Author Affiliations
Robert Sinn, Luminescent Technologies (United States)
Thuc Dam, Luminescent Technologies (United States)
Bob Gleason, Luminescent Technologies (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 7973:
Optical Microlithography XXIV
Mircea V. Dusa, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?