
Proceedings Paper
Optical proximity correction enhancement by using model based fragmentation approachesFormat | Member Price | Non-Member Price |
---|---|---|
$17.00 | $21.00 |
Paper Abstract
As the industry progresses toward smaller patterning nodes with tighter CD error budgets and narrower process
windows, the ability to control pattern quality becomes a critical, yield-limiting factor. In addition, as the feature size of
design layouts continues to decrease at 32nm and below, optical proximity correction (OPC) technology becomes more
complex and more difficult. From a lithographic point of view, it is the most important that the patterns are printed as
designed. However, unfavorable localized CD variation can be induced by the lithography process, which will cause
catastrophic patterning failures (i.e. ripple effects, and severe necking or bridging phenomenon) through process
variation. It is becoming even more severe with strong off-axis illumination conditions and other resolution enhancement
techniques (RETs). Traditionally, it can be reduced by optimizing the rule based edge fragmentation in the OPC setup,
but this fragmentation optimization is very dependent upon the engineer's skill. Most fragmentation is based on a set of
simple rules, but those rules may not always be robust in every possible design shape.
In this paper, a model based approach for solving these imaging distortions has been tested as opposed to a previous
rule based one. The model based approach is automatic correction techniques for reducing complexity of the OPC recipe.
This comes in the form of automatically adjusting fragments lengths along with feedback values at every OPC iterations
for a better convergence. The stability and coverage for this model based approach has been tested throughout various
layout cases.
Paper Details
Date Published: 3 March 2010
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 7640, Optical Microlithography XXIII, 76401F (3 March 2010); doi: 10.1117/12.848447
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 7640:
Optical Microlithography XXIII
Mircea V. Dusa; Will Conley, Editor(s)
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 7640, Optical Microlithography XXIII, 76401F (3 March 2010); doi: 10.1117/12.848447
Show Author Affiliations
Young-Seok Woo, SAMSUNG Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea, Republic of)
Woon-Hyuk Choi, SAMSUNG Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea, Republic of)
Beom-Seok Seo, SAMSUNG Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea, Republic of)
Yoo-Hyon Kim, SAMSUNG Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea, Republic of)
Vladislav Liubich, Mentor Graphics Corp. (United States)
Woon-Hyuk Choi, SAMSUNG Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea, Republic of)
Beom-Seok Seo, SAMSUNG Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea, Republic of)
Yoo-Hyon Kim, SAMSUNG Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea, Republic of)
Vladislav Liubich, Mentor Graphics Corp. (United States)
Shady Abdelwahed, Mentor Graphics Corp. (United States)
Juhwan Kim, Mentor Graphics Corp. (United States)
James Word, Mentor Graphics Corp. (United States)
Jong-Won Lee, Mentor Graphics Korea (Korea, Republic of)
Juhwan Kim, Mentor Graphics Corp. (United States)
James Word, Mentor Graphics Corp. (United States)
Jong-Won Lee, Mentor Graphics Korea (Korea, Republic of)
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 7640:
Optical Microlithography XXIII
Mircea V. Dusa; Will Conley, Editor(s)
© SPIE. Terms of Use
