Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Control and reduction of immersion defectivity for yield enhancement at high volume production
Author(s): Katsushi Nakano; Rei Seki; Toshiyuki Sekito; Masato Yoshida; Tomoharu Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Iriuchijima; Soichi Owa
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

Volume device manufacturing using immersion lithography is widely accepted as the solution for patterning IC features below 40 nm half pitch. In order to ensure high yield and steady productivity tight control of defectivity is essential. A major source of defects and tool contamination is the particles introduced by incoming wafers. Particles can be categorized in two groups: particles attached to wafer surface or residues on the wafer edge. Surface or edge peeling of topcoats can also be a source of particle. Adhesion force between topcoat or topcoat-less (TC-less) resist and wafer is one of the most important parameter for particle reduction. Peeling test results proved that TC-less resist has better adhesion performance than topcoat. One of the most commonly used adhesion promoting material is hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS). Application condition of this material is an important factor in preventing wafer edge and surface topcoat peeling. Studies have shown lower temperature and longer application of HMDS shows better adhesion result. Maintaining a clean wafer surface is also a very important factor for particle reduction. Pre-rinse, which can rinse off particles before exposure, was evaluated and the efficiency was confirmed. Edge particles are more effectively reduced by pre-rinse, because weakly attached topcoat and wafer edge residues were effectively removed by pre-rinse. For further particle reduction, edge residue reduction and cut line roughness improvement were evaluated and their effectiveness was confirmed. Lower cut position achieved improved particle counts on both topcoat and TC-less resist; more frequent contact between water and cut-line can weaken the adhesion and consequently peel off topcoat or TC-less resist. Finally the relationship between defectivity and hydrophobicity is analyzed, high Receding Contact Angle (RCA) showed better defectivity result. Topcoat and TC-less process is compared for each defectivity reduction methodology and for each category TC-less process always showed lower defectivity level and less sensitivity to process conditions, indicating that TC-less process is safer and more robust than topcoat process.

Paper Details

Date Published: 16 March 2009
PDF: 9 pages
Proc. SPIE 7274, Optical Microlithography XXII, 72741P (16 March 2009); doi: 10.1117/12.814238
Show Author Affiliations
Katsushi Nakano, Nikon Corp. (Japan)
Rei Seki, Nikon Corp. (Japan)
Toshiyuki Sekito, Nikon Corp. (Japan)
Masato Yoshida, Nikon Corp. (Japan)
Tomoharu Fujiwara, Nikon Corp. (Japan)
Yasuhiro Iriuchijima, Nikon Corp. (Japan)
Soichi Owa, Nikon Corp. (Japan)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 7274:
Optical Microlithography XXII
Harry J. Levinson; Mircea V. Dusa, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?