
Proceedings Paper
45nm node registration metrology on LTEM EUV reticlesFormat | Member Price | Non-Member Price |
---|---|---|
$17.00 | $21.00 |
Paper Abstract
Reticles for the 65nm technology node are already in production and leading edge mask shops will complete R&D for
45nm technology node reticles very soon. The specifications for registration for this new node are expected to be much
tighter than for previous generation reticles. New generation lithography (e-beam) tools will become available soon to
support the writing accuracy as required for 45nm node reticles. Tighter registration tolerances require a next generation
registration metrology tool, providing measurement performance to fulfill the specification of 45nm node and beyond.
EUV lithography might become the backup solution for next generations 32nm and 22nm nodes in order to overcome the
resolution limits of optical lithography. Considering the extremely tight mask to mask overlay tolerances of EUV
reticles, we will demonstrate the performance of the LMS IPRO4 for registration metrology on EUV masks.
We will present the actual system performance of the LMS IPRO4 on high-end Hoya EUV masks with various substrate
materials. A detailed analysis of measurement precision and accuracy performance of the new LMS IPRO4 will be
provided.
Additionally, we will present a comparison of measurement performance of EUV masks from quartz and EUV masks
from new LTEM material used as substrate. LTEM substrate enables to analyze soaking effects related to temperature
differences between stage and the mask itself. Results of an experiment will be shown, where we compare the soaking
time needed before starting the measurement process using quartz material and LTEM.
Paper Details
Date Published: 2 May 2008
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 6792, 24th European Mask and Lithography Conference, 67920Y (2 May 2008); doi: 10.1117/12.798939
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 6792:
24th European Mask and Lithography Conference
Uwe F.W. Behringer, Editor(s)
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 6792, 24th European Mask and Lithography Conference, 67920Y (2 May 2008); doi: 10.1117/12.798939
Show Author Affiliations
Frank Laske, Vistec Semiconductor Systems GmbH (Germany)
Hiroshi Kinoshita, Hoya Corp. (Japan)
Naoki Nishida, Hoya Corp. (Japan)
Daisuke Kenmochi, Hoya Corp. (Japan)
Hitoshi Ota, Dai Nippon Screen Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (Japan)
Hiroshi Kinoshita, Hoya Corp. (Japan)
Naoki Nishida, Hoya Corp. (Japan)
Daisuke Kenmochi, Hoya Corp. (Japan)
Hitoshi Ota, Dai Nippon Screen Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (Japan)
Yukitake Tanioka, Dai Nippon Screen Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (Japan)
Slawomir Czerkas, Vistec Semiconductor Systems GmbH (Germany)
Karl-Heinrich Schmidt, Vistec Semiconductor Systems GmbH (Germany)
Dieter Adam, Vistec Semiconductor Systems GmbH (Germany)
Klaus-Dieter Roeth, Vistec Semiconductor Systems GmbH (Germany)
Slawomir Czerkas, Vistec Semiconductor Systems GmbH (Germany)
Karl-Heinrich Schmidt, Vistec Semiconductor Systems GmbH (Germany)
Dieter Adam, Vistec Semiconductor Systems GmbH (Germany)
Klaus-Dieter Roeth, Vistec Semiconductor Systems GmbH (Germany)
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 6792:
24th European Mask and Lithography Conference
Uwe F.W. Behringer, Editor(s)
© SPIE. Terms of Use
