Visualisation of anatomical or pathological image data is highly dependent on the eye's ability to discriminate between image brightnesses and this is best achieved when these data are presented to the viewer at luminance levels to which the eye is adapted. Current ambient light recommendations are often linked to overall monitor luminance but this relies on specific regions of interest matching overall monitor brightness. The current work investigates the luminances of specific regions of interest within three image-types: postero-anterior (PA) chest; PA wrist; computerised tomography (CT) of the head. Luminance levels were measured within the hilar region and peripheral lung distal radius and supra-ventricular grey matter. For each image type average monitor luminances were calculated with a calibrated photometer at ambient light levels of 0, 100 and 400 lux. Thirty samples of each image-type were employed, resulting in a total of over 6,000 measurements. Results demonstrate that average monitor luminances varied from clinically-significant values by up to a factor of 4, 2 and 6 for chest, wrist and CT head images respectively. Values for the thoracic hilum and wrist were higher and for the peripheral lung and CT brain lower than overall monitor levels. The ambient light level had no impact on the results. The results demonstrate that clinically important radiological information for common radiological examinations is not being presented to the viewer in a way that facilitates optimised visual adaptation and subsequent interpretation. The importance of image-processing algorithms focussing on clinically-significant anatomical regions instead of radiographic projections is highlighted.

Date Published: 6 March 2008
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 6917, Medical Imaging 2008: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 69171I (6 March 2008); doi: 10.1117/12.779435

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 6917:
Medical Imaging 2008: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment
Berkman Sahiner; David J. Manning, Editor(s)