Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Impact of transmitted and reflected light inspection on mask inspectability, defect sensitivity, and mask design rule restrictions
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

The application of aggressive optical proximity correction (OPC) has permitted the extension of advanced lithographic technologies. OPC is also the source of challenges for the mask-maker. Sub-resolution features, small shapes between features and highly-fragmented edges in the design data are difficult to reproduce on masks and even more difficult to inspect. Since the inspection step examines every image on the mask, it is required to guarantee the total plate quality. The patterns themselves must be differentiated from defects, and the ability to recognize small deviations must be maintained. In other words, high inspectability at high defect sensitivities must be achieved simultaneously. This must be done without restricting necessary OPC designs features. Historically, transmitted light has been deployed for mask pattern inspection. Recently, the inspection challenge has been both enhanced and complicated by the introduction of reflected light pattern inspection. Reflected light reverses the image contrast of features, creating a new set of design limits. This paper introduces these new reflected inspection limits. Multiple platform capabilities will be incorporated into the study of reflected and transmitted inspection capability. The benefits and challenges of integrating a combination of transmitted and reflected light pattern inspection into manufacturing will be explored. Aerial Image Measurement System (AIMS) analysis will be used to help understand how to leverage the enhanced inspection capability while avoiding unnecessary restrictions on OPC.

Paper Details

Date Published: 15 May 2007
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 6607, Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology XIV, 66072E (15 May 2007); doi: 10.1117/12.728997
Show Author Affiliations
Yutaka Kodera, Toppan Electronics Inc. (United States)
Karen Badger, IBM Systems and Technology Group (United States)
Emily Gallagher, IBM Systems and Technology Group (United States)
Shinji Akima, Toppan Printing Co., Ltd. (Japan)
Mark Lawliss, IBM Systems and Technology Group (United States)
Hidehiro Ikeda, Toppan Electronics Inc. (United States)
Ian Stobert, IBM Systems and Technology Group (United States)
Yasutaka Kikuchi, Toppan Electronics Inc. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 6607:
Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology XIV
Hidehiro Watanabe, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?