Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Larger depth of focus for increased yield
Author(s): W. Thomas Cathey; Gregory Johnson
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

Large depths of focus can be obtained by modifying the pupil function of a projector lens. An image recorder with a threshhold greatly increases the number of phase functions that can be used. Simulations are given that show that it is feasible to increase the depth of focus by a factor of two or more by making modification of the phase in the aperture stop of the projector lens. Examples show new techniques that are used to design pupil-plane phase functions to produce images for contact holes with very little change over at least twice the normal focal depth. The penalty is that the side lobes are higher than for a system without modification in the pupil plane. A larger focal depth gives considerable potential cost savings. For example, the down time for focus correction of a lithographic system and re-work of wafers can be reduced if the focal depth of the projector is increased. Using the smallest numbers that were quoted, the down time for refocus (2% on 20% of the jobs) costs $4M/yr./machine. The 30% of re-work that is caused by focus problems costs $15M/yr./machine. Expensive flatter wafers need not be used. The cost of flatter wafers, when needed (10% of the time) with current machines, is more than $17M/yr./machine. Using the lowest numbers quoted, the totals for down time, re-work, and flatter wafers alone is $36M/yr./machine. In addition, masks can be cheaper because complexity for extending the depth of focus is not needed. We show the phase modifications that were used, how the phase modifications were found, and highlight the differences between the design techniques that we used and the previous work on extending the depth of focus.

Paper Details

Date Published: 12 May 2005
PDF: 7 pages
Proc. SPIE 5754, Optical Microlithography XVIII, (12 May 2005); doi: 10.1117/12.599043
Show Author Affiliations
W. Thomas Cathey, CDM Optics, Inc. (United States)
Gregory Johnson, CDM Optics, Inc. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 5754:
Optical Microlithography XVIII
Bruce W. Smith, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?