Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

ATR paradigm comparison with emphasis on model-based vision
Author(s): Edmund G. Zelnio
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

All automatic target recognizers (ATRs) either explicitly or implicitly use models and compute features, many use feedback, and all rely on some form of data for development and test. This paper compares three popular paradigms used for ATR--the prescreen, segment, classify (PSC) paradigm (commonly used when applying statistical pattern recognition techniques to image sensors), the matched filter (MF) paradigm, and the model-based vision (MBV) paradigm. This comparison is performed initially by considering how each contends with the ATR model space, which is introduced to aid the paradigm comparison. These paradigms are then compared in detail by examining how each uses models, features, feedback, and data to perform target recognition. Based on these discussions, three ATR sensors are examined in terms of the ATR model space to analyze how each sensor's imaging properties either help or hinder the solution of the ATR problem. The ATR model space concept is then used to motivate model-based vision solutions to the multi-sensor fusion problem and to suggest novel sensor combinations that could be used synergistically to attack the ATR problem.

Paper Details

Date Published: 1 February 1992
PDF: 14 pages
Proc. SPIE 1609, Model-Based Vision Development and Tools, (1 February 1992); doi: 10.1117/12.57111
Show Author Affiliations
Edmund G. Zelnio, Wright Lab. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 1609:
Model-Based Vision Development and Tools
Rodney M. Larson; Hatem N. Nasr, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?