Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Modeling LEEPL mask fabrication processes
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

The challenges in fabricating next-generation lithography (NGL) masks are distinct from those encountered in optical technology. The masks for electron proximity lithography, as well as those for ion and electron projection, use freestanding membranes incorporating layers that are different from the traditional chrome-on-glass photomask blanks. As a promising NGL technology, low-energy electron-beam proximity-projection lithography (LEEPL) will be subject to strict error budgets, requiring high pattern placement accuracy. Meeting these stringent conditions will necessitate an optimization of the design parameters involved in the mask fabrication process. Consequently, comprehensive simulations can be used to characterize the sources of the mechanical distortions induced in LEEPL masks during fabrication, pattern transfer, and mounting. For this purpose, finite element (FE) structural models have been developed to identify the response of the LEEPL mask during fabrication and chucking. Membrane prestress, which is used as input in the FE models, was measured on a 200-mm test mask and found to low in magnitude with excellent cross-mask uniformity. The numerical models were also validated both analytically and experimentally considering intrinsic and extrinsic loading of the mask. Finally, simulations were performed to predict the response of the LEEPL mask during electrostatic chucking. FE results indicate that the mask structure is sufficiently stiff to remain relatively flat under gravitational loadings. The results illustrate that mechanical modeling and simulation can facilitate the timely and cost-effective implementation of the LEEPL technology.

Paper Details

Date Published: 20 May 2004
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 5374, Emerging Lithographic Technologies VIII, (20 May 2004); doi: 10.1117/12.546927
Show Author Affiliations
Xabier Azkorra, Univ. of Wisconsin/Madison (United States)
Andrew R. Mikkelson, Univ. of Wisconsin/Madison (United States)
Roxann L. Engelstad, Univ. of Wisconsin/Madison (United States)
Edward G. Lovell, Univ. of Wisconsin/Madison (United States)
Jaehyuk Chang, Univ. of Wisconsin/Madison (United States)
Jaewoong Sohn, Univ. of Wisconsin/Madison (United States)
Madhura Nataraju, Univ. of Wisconsin/Madison (United States)
Hideyuki Eguchi, Toppan Printing Co., Ltd. (Japan)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 5374:
Emerging Lithographic Technologies VIII
R. Scott Mackay, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?