Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

General approach to optimizing digital mammography with respect to radiation risk
Author(s): Kent M. Ogden; Walter Huda; Ernest M. Scalzetti
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

We investigated how current biological uncertainties relating to the radiation risks for breast cancer impact on the optimization of x-ray tube potential (kV) in digital mammography. Digital images were taken of an accreditation phantom using voltages between 24 and 34 kV, and output between 5 and 500 mAs. The average glandular dose (D) at each x-ray tube voltage was determined at each technique setting. Image contrast of a 4 mm thick acrylic disk and the corresponding noise were used to determine the lesion contrast to noise ratio (CNR), which was taken as a relative measure of image quality when the selected x-ray technique factors (i.e., kV/mAs) are varied. The optimal kV for the detection of this simulated mass lesion was determined by maximizing a figure of merit (FOM), the ratio of CNR2/D. The kV that maximized the traditional FOM occurred at 27.3 kVp. The implication for optimization strategies was also analyzed for a radiation risk that is proportional to Dn; a value of n = 0 would correspond to no additional radiation risk, and n = 2 would correspond to a quadratic dose response curve. The x-ray voltage that yielded the highest generalized FOM value was 34 kV for n < 0.25, and 24 kV for n > 1.5. These results show that uncertainties in the form of the dose response curve for radiation induced breast cancer markedly influence the FOM parameter used for optimizing digital radiography imaging systems such as mammography.

Paper Details

Date Published: 5 June 2003
PDF: 7 pages
Proc. SPIE 5030, Medical Imaging 2003: Physics of Medical Imaging, (5 June 2003); doi: 10.1117/12.479972
Show Author Affiliations
Kent M. Ogden, SUNY Upstate Medical Univ. (United States)
Walter Huda, SUNY Upstate Medical Univ. (United States)
Ernest M. Scalzetti, SUNY Upstate Medical Univ. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 5030:
Medical Imaging 2003: Physics of Medical Imaging
Martin J. Yaffe; Larry E. Antonuk, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?