Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Linewidth measurement comparison between a photometric optical microscope and a scanning electron microscope backed with Monte Carlo trajectory computations
Author(s): John W. Nunn; Nicholas P. Turner
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

Linewidth measurements of clear lines on anti-reflection coated photomasks are obtained with a photometric optical microscope and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Both microscopes have stages fitted with helium-neon laser interferometers and thus provide directly traceable length measurements. In both instruments, measurements of pitches are independent of the choice of image edge intensity threshold, while linewidth measurements are greatly affected by the threshold levels. Simple scalar optical theory predicts that in the absence of aberrations, the position of the edge of a totally opaque film should be at the 25% intensity threshold for coherent illumination. The 50% backscattered electron intensity threshold has proved to be a repeatable point for measurements as it is very insensitive to such parameters as beam diameter, accelerating voltage and exact focus. The relationship between the 50% threshold and the dimensions of the sample itself is obtained with the aid of Monte Carlo electron trajectory calculations. Linewidth measurements made with the two different techniques on the same photomask are presented with particular interest in lines with widths below the resolving power of the optical microscope operated at visible wavelengths and using coherent illumination. The measurement agreement is better than 0.03 micrometers for lines which are fully resolved and increasingly worse for lines with widths below 0.7 micrometers . The degree to which theory predicts agreement between the two techniques and the resulting confidence in the SEM measurements are discussed.

Paper Details

Date Published: 1 July 1991
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 1464, Integrated Circuit Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control V, (1 July 1991); doi: 10.1117/12.44423
Show Author Affiliations
John W. Nunn, National Physical Lab. (United Kingdom)
Nicholas P. Turner, National Physical Lab. (United Kingdom)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 1464:
Integrated Circuit Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control V
William H. Arnold, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?