Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Effects of mask bias on the mask error enhancement factor (MEEF) of contact holes
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

The effects of mask bias on the Mask Error Enhancement Factor (MEEF) of 180 nm contact holes is studied through lithographic simulation using commercial software and a DUV (248 nm) ESCAP photoresist model. Dense contacts show higher MEEF than isolated or semi-dense contacts. However, dense features exhibit a minimum in MEEF at a single negative mask bias (CD on reticle > 180 nm). Aerial image simulations indicated that low MEEF correlates approximately with high normalized aerial image log-slope (NILS). Hence, factors that affect NILS, such as numerical aperture, partial coherence, and wavelength, also influence MEEF, although without altering the optimum mask bias for minimum dense MEEF. Numerical aperture and wavelength of exposure have the greatest influence on MEEF. For 180 nm contact holes worst case MEEF values below 2 can be achieved by increasing NA to 0.8 at 248 nm or by decreasing (lambda) to 193 nm at 0.6 NA. Resist identity has little influence on the magnitude of MEEF but was the only factor affecting the mask bias setting for minimum dense MEEF.

Paper Details

Date Published: 14 September 2001
PDF: 11 pages
Proc. SPIE 4346, Optical Microlithography XIV, (14 September 2001); doi: 10.1117/12.435786
Show Author Affiliations
Doris Kang, Shipley Co. Inc. (United States)
Stewart A. Robertson, Shipley Co. Inc. (United States)
Michael T. Reilly, Shipley Co. Inc. (United States)
Edward K. Pavelchek, Shipley Co. Inc. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 4346:
Optical Microlithography XIV
Christopher J. Progler, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?