Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

DQE of direct and indirect digital radiography systems
Author(s): Ehsan Samei; Michael J. Flynn; Harrell G. Chotas; James T. Dobbins III
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

Current flat-panel detectors either directly convert x-ray energy to electronic charge or use indirect conversion with an intermediate optical process. The purpose of this work was to compare direct and indirect detectors in terms of their modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Measurements were made on three flat-panel detectors, Philips Digital Diagnost, GE Revolution XQ/i, and Hologic Direct-Ray DR1000 using the IEC-defined RQA5 (approximately 75 kVp, 21 mm Al) and RQA9 (approximately 120 kVp, 40 mm Al) radiographic techniques. The presampled MTF of the systems was measured using an edge method (Samei et al., Med Phys 25:102, 1998). The NPS of the systems was determined for a range of exposure levels by 2D Fourier analysis of uniformly exposed radiographs (Flynn and Samei, Med Phys 26:1612, 1999). The ideal signal-to-noise ratio per exposure for each system was estimated using a semi-empirical x-ray model. The DQE, reported only at the RQA5 technique, was assessed from the measured MTF, NPS, exposure, and the ideal signal-to-noise ratio. For the direct system, the MTF was found to be significantly higher than that for the indirect systems and very close to an ideal function associated with the detector pixel size. The NPS for the direct system was found to be constant in relation to frequency. The DQE results reflected expected differences based on the absorption efficiency of the different detector materials. Using RQA5 and 0.3 mR exposure, the measured DQE values at spatial frequencies of 0.15 mm-1 and 2.5 mm-1 were 64% and 14% for the XQ/i system and 35% and 19% for DR-1000. Using RQA5 and the averages at all exposures, the corresponding values were 58% and 13% for the XQ/i system and 36% and 19% for DR-1000.

Paper Details

Date Published: 28 June 2001
PDF: 9 pages
Proc. SPIE 4320, Medical Imaging 2001: Physics of Medical Imaging, (28 June 2001); doi: 10.1117/12.430953
Show Author Affiliations
Ehsan Samei, Duke Univ. Medical Ctr. (United States)
Michael J. Flynn, Henry Ford Health System (United States)
Harrell G. Chotas, Duke Univ. Medical Ctr. (United States)
James T. Dobbins III, Duke Univ. Medical Ctr. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 4320:
Medical Imaging 2001: Physics of Medical Imaging
Larry E. Antonuk; Martin Joel Yaffe, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top