Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Wafer printability simulation accuracy based on UV optical inspection images of reticle defects
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

As semiconductor processes have moved towards lower k1 and mask inspection equipment has moved into the UV range, more subtle reticle defects have been found to cause manufacturing problems. Lower k1 and new lithography processes and reticle technologies, such as OPC and PSM, have made it difficult to determine the significant and these defects. This paper reports on the development of a simulation tool that will improve the yield and productivity of photomask manufacturers and wafer manufacturers by improving reticle defect assessment. This study demonstrates the accuracy of simulation software that predicts resist patterns based on sophisticated modeling software that uses optical images obtained from a state-of-the-art UV optical inspection system. A DUV 4X reduction stepper was used to print a reticle with programmed defects across an exposure/focus matrix, with the minimum feature size being 200 nm. Quantitative comparisons between predicted and measured wafer CDs were made. In summary, it was found that the simulation software based solely on aerial images predicted absolute CDs with limited accuracy, but differential CDs with limited accuracy, but differential CDs, obtained by utilizing both the reference and defect images, were predicted accurately. Comparison of simulations using both reticle SEM images and optical reticle inspection images showed good agreement, demonstrating the accuracy and high resolution of the optical reticle inspection images. Application of differential aerial images to a simple test case showed that it was possible to identify and therefore eliminate a significant number of defects that did not print, thereby improving defect assessment.

Paper Details

Date Published: 14 June 1999
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 3677, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XIII, (14 June 1999); doi: 10.1117/12.350857
Show Author Affiliations
Donald W. Pettibone, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Mohan Ananth, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Maciej W. Rudzinski, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Sterling G. Watson, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Larry S. Zurbrick, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Hua-Yu Liu, Numerical Technologies, Inc. (United States)
Linard Karklin, Numerical Technologies, Inc. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 3677:
Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XIII
Bhanwar Singh, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?