Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Feature-based retinal image registration for longitudinal analysis of patients with age-related macular degeneration
Author(s): Tharindu De Silva; Nathan Hotaling; Emily Y. Chew; Catherine Cukras
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

Spatial alignment of longitudinally acquired retinal images is necessary for the development of image-based metrics identifying structural features associated with disease progression in diseases such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This work develops and evaluates a feature-based registration framework for accurate and robust registration of retinal images. Methods: Two feature-based registration approaches were investigated for the alignment of fundus auto-fluorescence images. The first method used conventional SIFT local feature descriptors to solve for the geometric transformation between two corresponding point-sets. The second method used a deep-learning approach with a network architecture mirroring the feature localization and matching process of the conventional method. The methods were validated using clinical images acquired in an ongoing longitudinal study of AMD and consisted of 75 patients (145 eyes) with 4 year follow up imaging. In the deep-learning method, 113 image pairs were used during training (with the ground truth provided from manually verified SIFT feature registration) and 20 image pairs were used for testing (with the ground truth provided from manual landmark annotation). Results: Conventional method using SIFT features demonstrated target registration error (mean ± std) = 0.05 ± 0.04 mm, substantially improving the alignment from the initialization with error = 0.34 ± 0.22 mm. The deep-learning method, on the other hand, exhibited error = 0.10 ± 0.07 mm. While both methods improved upon the initial misalignment, SIFT method showed the best overall geometric accuracy. However, deep-learning method exhibited robust performance (error = 0.15 ± 0.09 mm) in the 7% of cases that SIFT method exhibited failures (error = 3.71 ± 6.36 mm). Conclusion: While both methods demonstrated successful performance, SIFT method exhibited the best overall geometric accuracy whereas deep-learning method was superior in terms of robustness. Achieving accurate and robust registration is essential in large-scale studies investigating factors underlying retinal disease progression such as in AMD.

Paper Details

Date Published: 10 March 2020
PDF: 6 pages
Proc. SPIE 11313, Medical Imaging 2020: Image Processing, 113132Z (10 March 2020); doi: 10.1117/12.2549969
Show Author Affiliations
Tharindu De Silva, National Institutes of Health (United States)
Nathan Hotaling, National Institutes of Health (United States)
Emily Y. Chew, National Institutes of Health (United States)
Catherine Cukras, National Institutes of Health (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 11313:
Medical Imaging 2020: Image Processing
Ivana Išgum; Bennett A. Landman, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
PREMIUM CONTENT
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?
close_icon_gray