Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

In vivo noise texture estimation: development and validation of an automated methodology
Author(s): Taylor Brunton Smith; Ehsan Abadi; T. J. Sauer; Wanyi Fu; Justin Solomon; Ehsan Samei
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop, validate, and evaluate a method for measuring noise texture directly from patient CT images (i.e., “in vivo”). The method identifies target regions within patient scans which are least likely to have major contribution of patient anatomy, detrends these regions locally, and measures noise power spectrum (NPS) there using previously phantomvalidated techniques. Method development and validation used scanner-specific CT simulations of computational, anthropomorphic phantom (XCAT phantom at three phases of contrast enhancement) with known ground truth of the NPS. Simulations were based on a clinical scanner (Definition Flash, Siemens) and clinically relevant settings (tube voltage of 120kV at 3 dose levels). Images were reconstructed with filtered backprojection (kernel: B31, B41, B50) and Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (kernel: I31, I41, I50) algorithms using a manufacturer-specific reconstruction software (ReconCT, Siemens). All NPS measurements were made in the liver. Ground-truth NPS were taken as the sum of 1) a measurement in parenchymal regions of anatomy-subtracted (i.e. “noise only”) scans, and 2) a measurement in the same region of “noise-free” (pre-noise-insertion) images. To assess the performance of the in vivo NPS, the accuracy and bias of NPS average frequency (favg), and integrated noise magnitude were reported across the simulated scan population representing 2 reconstruction algorithms, 3 kernels, 3 dose levels, and 3 liver vasculature-to-parenchyma contrast levels. Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficient pairs were 0.97 and 0.93, and 1.0 and 0.99 for favg and noise magnitude, respectively. Finally, the NPS estimation method was further deployed on clinical cases to assess the feasibility of clinical analysis.

Paper Details

Date Published: 16 March 2020
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 11312, Medical Imaging 2020: Physics of Medical Imaging, 113121U (16 March 2020);
Show Author Affiliations
Taylor Brunton Smith, Duke Univ. (United States)
Duke Univ. Medical Ctr. (United States)
Ehsan Abadi, Duke Univ. (United States)
Duke Univ. Medical Ctr. (United States)
T. J. Sauer, Duke Univ. (United States)
Duke Univ. Medical Ctr. (United States)
Wanyi Fu, Duke Univ. (United States)
Duke Univ. Medical Ctr. (United States)
Justin Solomon, Duke Univ. (United States)
Duke Univ. Medical Ctr. (United States)
Ehsan Samei, Duke Univ. (United States)
Duke Univ. Medical Ctr. (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 11312:
Medical Imaging 2020: Physics of Medical Imaging
Guang-Hong Chen; Hilde Bosmans, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
PREMIUM CONTENT
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?
close_icon_gray