
Proceedings Paper
Comparison of 3D finite-difference methods for modeling waveguide components embedded in a general optical systemFormat | Member Price | Non-Member Price |
---|---|---|
$17.00 | $21.00 |
Paper Abstract
Optical waveguide devices typically have dimensions transverse to the main propagation direction on the order of a
fraction of a millimeter and therefore, cannot be modeled by ray or beam tracing techniques. In this small domain,
numerical solutions of the fundamental field equations are usually employed. Two such implicit FD-BPM (Finite-
Difference Beam Propagation Method) techniques have been integrated into a general optical engineering code: a full
vector paraxial and scalar non-paraxial. Along with a more rigorous FDTD (Finite-Difference Time-Domain)
calculation, their relative accuracies and efficiencies are compared on the practical 3D problem of coupling an optical
system's focused spot into a single-mode fiber using a tapered mode converter. In all but the most extreme cases, the
agreement between all three is better than expected especially considering that the runtimes vary drastically on a manycore
desktop, with and without the help of a modern number-crunching GPU (Graphics Processing Unit).
Paper Details
Date Published: 11 September 2019
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 11103, Optical Modeling and System Alignment, 111030L (11 September 2019); doi: 10.1117/12.2526531
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 11103:
Optical Modeling and System Alignment
Mark A. Kahan; José Sasián; Richard N. Youngworth, Editor(s)
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 11103, Optical Modeling and System Alignment, 111030L (11 September 2019); doi: 10.1117/12.2526531
Show Author Affiliations
Alan W. Greynolds, Retired (United States)
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 11103:
Optical Modeling and System Alignment
Mark A. Kahan; José Sasián; Richard N. Youngworth, Editor(s)
© SPIE. Terms of Use
