Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Investigation of mask absorber induced image shift in EUV lithography
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

With the introduction of EUV lithography into early manufacturing, the lithography community still struggles with some imaging issues, like the magnitude of usable depth of focus, and reduced contrast which can impact stochastic effects such as defectivity and line edge roughness. In recent years EMF mask effects and their impact on best focus shift in EUV lithography were investigated, and alternative absorber stacks were proposed in order to improve control of focus and contrast. Recently, interest in phase shifting masks has resurfaced, and there are proposals for alternative absorber stacks that depend on feature type to be patterned. In this paper, we investigate the phenomenon that for a dipole the separate images of the two monopoles do not overlap with each other. This means that the contrast for the dipole is measurably lower than that of the individual monopoles. We discuss the impact of this effect on contrast and usable depth of focus, propose a method to measure this image split effect, and investigate which absorber materials can reduce it. One approach to suppressing the image split has been the choice of a material that is index matched to vacuum, which therefore shows a negligible image split behavior. While this image split is indeed largely suppressed for absorbers with n ≈ 1, those materials have markedly low intrinsic image contrast, making them unsuitable as absorbers. Instead, we have converged on absorbers that create either a significant phase shift or feature very strong absorption, with recent proposals coming close to a π phase shift for attPSM. We hypothesize that the close index match to vacuum is detrimental to imaging because a larger part of the light is absorbed which would otherwise have contributed to imaging.

Paper Details

Date Published: 26 March 2019
PDF: 19 pages
Proc. SPIE 10957, Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Lithography X, 1095710 (26 March 2019); doi: 10.1117/12.2515365
Show Author Affiliations
Martin Burkhardt, IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Ctr. (United States)
Anuja De Silva, IBM Research (United States)
Jennifer Church, IBM Research (United States)
Luciana Meli, IBM Research (United States)
Chris Robinson, IBM Research (United States)
Nelson Felix, IBM Research (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 10957:
Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Lithography X
Kenneth A. Goldberg, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?