Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Statistical significance of STEM based metrology on advanced 3D transistor structures
Author(s): Laurens Kwakman; Anne Kenslea; Hayley Johanesen; Jillian Cramer; Michael Strauss; Werner Boullart; Hans Mertens; Yong Kong Siew; Kathy Barla
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

Metrology of most advanced CMOS devices poses more and more challenges: lithography and etch patterning processes need to be controlled on critical parameters that -beyond critical dimensions (CD)- nowadays also include line width and line edge roughness (LWR/LER), multiple patterning induced pitch-walk and, due to the high aspect ratio of the patterned structures, also thermo-mechanical structural bending.

In this paper, it is shown that sufficient sampling is required to ensure that scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) does provide relevant information about the dimensions and chemical composition of the advanced devices. While, in principle, STEM can measure device dimensions with Angstrom resolution and sub-nm precision, a single measurement will not be representative for the device dimensions that are known to vary statistically (LER/LWR) as well as systematically (Pitch-walk, structural bending).

In this context, the metrology capabilities of a (calibrated) automated 80-200kV STEM with Cs aberration corrector and a high efficiency EDS detector have been evaluated for both STEM-EDS and STEM-HAADF acquisitions. It will be shown that, when measuring multiple (~ 400) individual FinFET structures (Silicon Fins / dummy Silicon gate lines), average CD, LER and LWR can be quantified from the distribution of measured line widths and line pitches, that SADP and SAQP induced pitch-walk may show up as multi-modal pitch distributions, and that pitch walking can be quantified if also structural bending, that is observed, is properly taken into account.

Finally, the STEM and EDS metrology capabilities for FinFET and NanoWire (NW) device structures are reviewed for different use cases (statistical process control and technology development support) and with different indicators (Precision over Tolerance ratio (P/T) and Variability ratio (r = 1 – σ2 metrology / σ2 measured process )).

Paper Details

Date Published: 26 March 2019
PDF: 14 pages
Proc. SPIE 10959, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIII, 109590C (26 March 2019); doi: 10.1117/12.2514963
Show Author Affiliations
Laurens Kwakman, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Netherlands)
Anne Kenslea, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (United States)
Hayley Johanesen, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (United States)
Jillian Cramer, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (United States)
Michael Strauss, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (United States)
Werner Boullart, IMEC (Belgium)
Hans Mertens, IMEC (Belgium)
Yong Kong Siew, IMEC (Belgium)
Kathy Barla, IMEC (Belgium)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 10959:
Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIII
Vladimir A. Ukraintsev; Ofer Adan, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?