Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Human variation in dark adaptation facility
Author(s): Morris R. Lattimore; Aaron M. McAtee
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

There is mounting evidence that the military’s emphasis on photopic visual performance standards in the absence of mesopic and scotopic standards is a major oversight. The lack of an individualized mesopic capability represents a scientific knowledge gap that could impact soldier survivability. Data from 24 subjects (who had participated in a project on “Facilitating the transition from bright to dim environments”) have been re-assessed with regard to their individual dark adaptation response variability. A reduced ‘bleaching’ stimulus of 378 foot Lamberts (fL), lasting only 5 minutes, often elicited a rod-cone break in a matter of seconds. The time required for each subject to subsequently detect and identify as many of 10 reduced–intensity light sources was measured. The 2° lighted targets ranged from 0.250 fL to 0.001 fL in luminance. The dark adaptation time to detect the 0.002 fL target was 60.81 +/- 26.9 seconds (mean +/- standard deviation) for the control condition. The clear spectacle lens group took 78.99 +/- 44.34 seconds. Grouped data analysis indicated the lack of a statistically significant difference between the data-sets by t-test (p ≤ 0.06). Yet, there is a difference in the degree of response variability by both grouped data sets, as well as by individual data response variability. Variation between the control and lens-wearing conditions can readily be explained by 8-10% transmission losses from surface reflections, and direct glare interference. Nevertheless, both iterations exhibited a varied facility or speed of dark adaptation, which further varied on the testretest condition, meaning there was no learning effect from the first test to the second one. This same visual sensitivity variability characteristic is duplicated within the realm of visual resolution.

Paper Details

Date Published: 5 May 2017
PDF: 14 pages
Proc. SPIE 10197, Degraded Environments: Sensing, Processing, and Display 2017, 1019703 (5 May 2017); doi: 10.1117/12.2262213
Show Author Affiliations
Morris R. Lattimore, U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Lab. (United States)
Aaron M. McAtee, Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education (United States)
U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Lab. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 10197:
Degraded Environments: Sensing, Processing, and Display 2017
John (Jack) N. Sanders-Reed; Jarvis (Trey) J. Arthur III, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?