Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Alignment solutions on FBEOL layers using ASML scanners
Author(s): Pavan Samudrala; Gregory Hart; Yen-Jen Chen; Lokesh Subramany; Haiyong Gao; Nyan Aung; Woong Jae Chung; Blandine Minghetti; Rajan Mali; Seva Khikhlovskyi; Pieter Heres
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

Wafers at FBEOL layers traditionally have higher stress and larger alignment signal variability. ASML’s ATHENA sensor based scanners, commonly used to expose FBEOL layers, have large spot size (~700um). Hence ATHENA captures the signal from larger area compared to the alignment marks which are typically ~40um wide. This results in higher noise in the alignment signal and if the surrounding areas contain periodic product structures, they interfere with the alignment signal causing either alignment rejects or in some cases- misalignment. SMASH alignment sensors with smaller spot size (~40um) and two additional probe lasers have been used to improve alignment quality and hence reduce mark/wafer rejects. However, due to the process variability, alignment issues still persist. For example, the aluminum grain size, alignment mark trench deposition uniformity, alignment mark asymmetry and variation in stack thicknesses all contribute to the alignment signal variability even within a single wafer. Here, a solution using SMASH sensor that involves designing new alignment marks to ensure conformal coating is proposed. Also new techniques and controls during coarse wafer alignment (COWA) and fine wafer alignment (FIWA) including extra controls over wafer shape parameters, longer scan lengths on alignment marks and weighted light source between Far Infra-Red laser (FIR) and Near Infra-Red (NIR) for alignment are presented. All the above mentioned techniques, when implemented, have reduced the wafer alignment reject rate from around 25% to less than 0.1%. Future work includes mark validation based on the signal response from the various laser colors. Finally, process monitoring using alignment parameters is explored.

Paper Details

Date Published: 24 March 2017
PDF: 7 pages
Proc. SPIE 10147, Optical Microlithography XXX, 101471T (24 March 2017); doi: 10.1117/12.2258128
Show Author Affiliations
Pavan Samudrala, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (United States)
Gregory Hart, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (United States)
Yen-Jen Chen, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (United States)
Lokesh Subramany, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (United States)
Haiyong Gao, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (United States)
Nyan Aung, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (United States)
Woong Jae Chung, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (United States)
Blandine Minghetti, ASML (United States)
Rajan Mali, ASML (United States)
Seva Khikhlovskyi, ASML Netherlands B.V. (Netherlands)
Pieter Heres, ASML Netherlands B.V. (Netherlands)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 10147:
Optical Microlithography XXX
Andreas Erdmann; Jongwook Kye, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?