Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Investigation of four classical groove patterns with three typical tool types for use in the rigid tool smoothing process
Author(s): Hsing-Yu Wu; Kai Meng
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

When a surface experiencing robotic processing to improve its optical performance (such as removing mid-spatial frequencies, localized grinding errors, and regional surface scratches), spindle speed, tool travel speed, pressure, slurry density as well as groove patterns are main factors to influence surface finishes. Based on the desired material removal rate, the Preston equation can provide optimized pressures and velocities between the tool and processed surface. Various groove patterns, however, can hardly predict by the equation because different patterns can cause unique tool deformation and pressure distribution, leading to determine unique smoothing result. In this paper, four typical groove patterns are studied: non-groove, grid grove, annular groove and radial groove with three typical tool types are evaluated by Finite Element Method (FEM) and statistics. Characteristics of these tools and groove patterns are presented in the end of this paper.

Paper Details

Date Published: 22 July 2016
PDF: 7 pages
Proc. SPIE 9912, Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation II, 991248 (22 July 2016); doi: 10.1117/12.2244114
Show Author Affiliations
Hsing-Yu Wu, OpTIC-Glyndwr (United Kingdom)
Univ. College London (United Kingdom)
Kai Meng, Institute of Optics and Electronics (China)
Univ. of Chinese Academy of Sciences (China)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9912:
Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation II
Ramón Navarro; James H. Burge, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?