Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Reduction of wafer-edge overlay errors using advanced correction models, optimized for minimal metrology requirements
Author(s): Min-Suk Kim; Hwa-Yeon Won; Jong-Mun Jeong; Paul Böcker; Lydia Vergaij-Huizer; Michiel Kupers; Milenko Jovanović; Inez Sochal; Kevin Ryan; Kyu-Tae Sun; Young-Wan Lim; Jin-Moo Byun; Gwang-Gon Kim; Jung-Joon Suh
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

In order to optimize yield in DRAM semiconductor manufacturing for 2x nodes and beyond, the (processing induced) overlay fingerprint towards the edge of the wafer needs to be reduced. Traditionally, this is achieved by acquiring denser overlay metrology at the edge of the wafer, to feed field-by-field corrections. Although field-by-field corrections can be effective in reducing localized overlay errors, the requirement for dense metrology to determine the corrections can become a limiting factor due to a significant increase of metrology time and cost. In this study, a more cost-effective solution has been found in extending the regular correction model with an edge-specific component. This new overlay correction model can be driven by an optimized, sparser sampling especially at the wafer edge area, and also allows for a reduction of noise propagation. Lithography correction potential has been maximized, with significantly less metrology needs. Evaluations have been performed, demonstrating the benefit of edge models in terms of on-product overlay performance, as well as cell based overlay performance based on metrology-to-cell matching improvements. Performance can be increased compared to POR modeling and sampling, which can contribute to (overlay based) yield improvement. Based on advanced modeling including edge components, metrology requirements have been optimized, enabling integrated metrology which drives down overall metrology fab footprint and lithography cycle time.

Paper Details

Date Published: 15 March 2016
PDF: 11 pages
Proc. SPIE 9780, Optical Microlithography XXIX, 97800A (15 March 2016); doi: 10.1117/12.2220459
Show Author Affiliations
Min-Suk Kim, SK Hynix, Inc. (Korea, Republic of)
Hwa-Yeon Won, SK Hynix, Inc. (Korea, Republic of)
Jong-Mun Jeong, SK Hynix, Inc. (Korea, Republic of)
Paul Böcker, ASML Netherlands B.V. (Netherlands)
Lydia Vergaij-Huizer, ASML Netherlands B.V. (Netherlands)
Michiel Kupers, ASML Netherlands B.V. (Netherlands)
Milenko Jovanović, ASML Netherlands B.V. (Netherlands)
Inez Sochal, ASML Netherlands B.V. (Netherlands)
Kevin Ryan, ASML Netherlands B.V. (Netherlands)
Kyu-Tae Sun, ASML Korea Co., Ltd. (Korea, Republic of)
Young-Wan Lim, ASML Korea Co., Ltd. (Korea, Republic of)
Jin-Moo Byun, ASML Korea Co., Ltd. (Korea, Republic of)
Gwang-Gon Kim, ASML Korea Co., Ltd. (Korea, Republic of)
Jung-Joon Suh, ASML Korea Co., Ltd. (Korea, Republic of)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9780:
Optical Microlithography XXIX
Andreas Erdmann; Jongwook Kye, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?