
Proceedings Paper
Single-plane versus three-plane methods for relative range error evaluation of medium-range 3D imaging systemsFormat | Member Price | Non-Member Price |
---|---|---|
$17.00 | $21.00 |
Paper Abstract
Within the context of the ASTM E57 working group WK12373, we compare the two methods that had been initially proposed for calculating the relative range error of medium-range (2 m to 150 m) optical non-contact 3D imaging systems: the first is based on a single plane (single-plane assembly) and the second on an assembly of three mutually non-orthogonal planes (three-plane assembly). Both methods are evaluated for their utility in generating a metric to quantify the relative range error of medium-range optical non-contact 3D imaging systems. We conclude that the three-plane assembly is comparable to the single-plane assembly with regard to quantification of relative range error while eliminating the requirement to isolate the edges of the target plate face.
Paper Details
Date Published: 21 June 2015
PDF: 19 pages
Proc. SPIE 9528, Videometrics, Range Imaging, and Applications XIII, 95280R (21 June 2015); doi: 10.1117/12.2179591
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9528:
Videometrics, Range Imaging, and Applications XIII
Fabio Remondino; Mark R. Shortis, Editor(s)
PDF: 19 pages
Proc. SPIE 9528, Videometrics, Range Imaging, and Applications XIII, 95280R (21 June 2015); doi: 10.1117/12.2179591
Show Author Affiliations
David K. MacKinnon, National Research Council Canada (Canada)
Luc Cournoyer, National Research Council Canada (Canada)
Luc Cournoyer, National Research Council Canada (Canada)
J.-Angelo Beraldin, National Research Council Canada (Canada)
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9528:
Videometrics, Range Imaging, and Applications XIII
Fabio Remondino; Mark R. Shortis, Editor(s)
© SPIE. Terms of Use
