Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

The visual light field in paintings of Museum Prinsenhof: comparing settings in empty space and on objects
Author(s): Tatiana Kartashova; Huib de Ridder; Susan F. te Pas; Marga Schoemaker; Sylvia C. Pont
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether inferences of light in the empty space of a painting and on objects in that painting are congruent with each other. We conducted an experiment in which we tested the perception of light qualities (direction, intensity of directed and ambient components) for two conditions: a) for a position in empty space in a painting and b) on the convex object that was replaced by the probe in the first condition. We found that the consistency of directional settings both between conditions and within paintings is highly dependent on painting content, specifically on the number of qualitatively different light zones[1] in a scene. For uniform lighting observers are very consistent, but when there are two or more light zones present in a painting the individual differences become prominent. We discuss several possible explanations of such results, the most plausible of which is that human observers are blind to complex features of a light field2.

Paper Details

Date Published: 17 March 2015
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 9394, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XX, 93941M (17 March 2015); doi: 10.1117/12.2085030
Show Author Affiliations
Tatiana Kartashova, Technische Univ. Delft (Netherlands)
Huib de Ridder, Technische Univ. Delft (Netherlands)
Susan F. te Pas, Utrecht Univ. (Netherlands)
Marga Schoemaker, Museum Prinsenhof Delft (Netherlands)
Sylvia C. Pont, Technische Univ. Delft (Netherlands)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9394:
Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XX
Bernice E. Rogowitz; Thrasyvoulos N. Pappas; Huib de Ridder, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top