
Proceedings Paper
3D-printed surface mould applicator for high-dose-rate brachytherapyFormat | Member Price | Non-Member Price |
---|---|---|
$17.00 | $21.00 |
Paper Abstract
In contemporary high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment of superficial tumors, catheters are placed in a wax mould. The creation of current wax models is a difficult and time consuming proces.The irradiation plan can only be computed post-construction and requires a second CT scan. In case no satisfactory dose plan can be created, the mould is discarded and the process is repeated. The objective of this work was to develop an automated method to replace suboptimal wax moulding. We developed a method to design and manufacture moulds that guarantee to yield satisfactory dosimetry. A 3D-printed mould with channels for the catheters designed from the patient’s CT and mounted on a patient-specific thermoplastic mesh mask. The mould planner was implemented as an open-source module in the 3D Slicer platform. Series of test moulds were created to accommodate standard brachytherapy catheters of 1.70mm diameter. A calibration object was used to conclude that tunnels with a diameter of 2.25mm, minimum 12mm radius of curvature, and 1.0mm open channel gave the best fit for this printer/catheter combination. Moulds were created from the CT scan of thermoplastic mesh masks of actual patients. The patient-specific moulds have been visually verified to fit on the thermoplastic meshes. The masks were visually shown to fit onto the thermoplastic meshes, next the resulting dosimetry will have to be compared with treatment plans and dosimetry achieved with conventional wax moulds in order to validate our 3D printed moulds.
Paper Details
Date Published: 18 March 2015
PDF: 7 pages
Proc. SPIE 9415, Medical Imaging 2015: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling, 94152E (18 March 2015); doi: 10.1117/12.2082543
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9415:
Medical Imaging 2015: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling
Robert J. Webster III; Ziv R. Yaniv, Editor(s)
PDF: 7 pages
Proc. SPIE 9415, Medical Imaging 2015: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling, 94152E (18 March 2015); doi: 10.1117/12.2082543
Show Author Affiliations
Mark Schumacher, Queen's Univ. (Canada)
Andras Lasso, Queen's Univ. (Canada)
Ian Cumming, Queen's Univ. (Canada)
Adam Rankin, Queen's Univ. (Canada)
Andras Lasso, Queen's Univ. (Canada)
Ian Cumming, Queen's Univ. (Canada)
Adam Rankin, Queen's Univ. (Canada)
Conrad B. Falkson, Queen's Univ. (Canada)
Kingston General Hospital (Canada)
L. John Schreiner, Kingston General Hospital (Canada)
Queen's Univ. (Canada)
Chandra Joshi, Kingston General Hospital (Canada)
Queen's Univ. (Canada)
Gabor Fichtinger, Queen's Univ. (Canada)
Kingston General Hospital (Canada)
L. John Schreiner, Kingston General Hospital (Canada)
Queen's Univ. (Canada)
Chandra Joshi, Kingston General Hospital (Canada)
Queen's Univ. (Canada)
Gabor Fichtinger, Queen's Univ. (Canada)
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9415:
Medical Imaging 2015: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling
Robert J. Webster III; Ziv R. Yaniv, Editor(s)
© SPIE. Terms of Use
