Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

A tale of three trials: from science to junk science
Author(s): Bryan R. Burnett
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

The defendant had three trials. The first and second ended in mistrial; the third he was convicted. Examination of the gunshot residue evidence presented in the first and third trials starkly define an extraordinary difference: science versus junk science. The defendant was convicted on the junk science.

Paper Details

Date Published: 16 September 2014
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 9236, Scanning Microscopies 2014, 923619 (16 September 2014); doi: 10.1117/12.2065556
Show Author Affiliations
Bryan R. Burnett, Meixa Tech (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9236:
Scanning Microscopies 2014
Michael T. Postek; Dale E. Newbury; S. Frank Platek; Tim K. Maugel, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?