Proceedings Paper
A tale of three trials: from science to junk science| Format | Member Price | Non-Member Price |
|---|---|---|
| $17.00 | $21.00 |
Paper Abstract
The defendant had three trials. The first and second ended in mistrial; the third he was convicted. Examination of the
gunshot residue evidence presented in the first and third trials starkly define an extraordinary difference: science versus
junk science. The defendant was convicted on the junk science.
Paper Details
Date Published: 16 September 2014
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 9236, Scanning Microscopies 2014, 923619 (16 September 2014); doi: 10.1117/12.2065556
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9236:
Scanning Microscopies 2014
Michael T. Postek; Dale E. Newbury; S. Frank Platek; Tim K. Maugel, Editor(s)
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 9236, Scanning Microscopies 2014, 923619 (16 September 2014); doi: 10.1117/12.2065556
Show Author Affiliations
Bryan R. Burnett, Meixa Tech (United States)
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9236:
Scanning Microscopies 2014
Michael T. Postek; Dale E. Newbury; S. Frank Platek; Tim K. Maugel, Editor(s)
© SPIE. Terms of Use
