
Proceedings Paper
Compressed sensing techniques for arbitrary frequency-sparse signals in structural health monitoringFormat | Member Price | Non-Member Price |
---|---|---|
$17.00 | $21.00 |
Paper Abstract
Structural health monitoring requires collection of large number sample data and sometimes high frequent vibration data
for detecting the damage of structures. The expensive cost for collecting the data is a big challenge. The recent proposed
Compressive Sensing method enables a potentially large reduction in the sampling, and it is a way to meet the challenge.
The Compressed Sensing theory requires sparse signal, meaning that the signals can be well-approximated as a linear
combination of just a few elements from a known discrete basis or dictionary. The signal of structure vibration can be
decomposed into a few sinusoid linear combinations in the DFT domain. Unfortunately, in most cases, the frequencies of
decomposed sinusoid are arbitrary in that domain, which may not lie precisely on the discrete DFT basis or dictionary. In
this case, the signal will lost its sparsity, and that makes recovery performance degrades significantly. One way to
improve the sparsity of the signal is to increase the size of the dictionary, but there exists a tradeoff: the closely-spaced
DFT dictionary will increase the coherence between the elements in the dictionary, which in turn decreases recovery
performance.
In this work we introduce three approaches for arbitrary frequency signals recovery. The first approach is the continuous
basis pursuit (CBP), which reconstructs a continuous basis by introducing interpolation steps. The second approach is a
semidefinite programming (SDP), which searches the sparest signal on continuous basis without establish any dictionary,
enabling a very high recovery precision. The third approach is spectral iterative hard threshold (SIHT), which is based on
redundant DFT dictionary and a restricted union-of-subspaces signal model, inhibiting closely spaced sinusoids. The
three approaches are studied by numerical simulation. Structure vibration signal is simulated by a finite element model,
and compressed measurements of the signal are taken to perform signal recovery. Comparison of the performance of the
three approaches is made, and future work on design of compressive sampling testing system for vibration signal is
proposed.
Paper Details
Date Published: 8 March 2014
PDF: 9 pages
Proc. SPIE 9061, Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2014, 90612W (8 March 2014); doi: 10.1117/12.2048276
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9061:
Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2014
Jerome P. Lynch; Kon-Well Wang; Hoon Sohn, Editor(s)
PDF: 9 pages
Proc. SPIE 9061, Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2014, 90612W (8 March 2014); doi: 10.1117/12.2048276
Show Author Affiliations
Zhongdong Duan, Harbin Institute of Technology (China)
Jie Kang, Harbin Institute of Technology (China)
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9061:
Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2014
Jerome P. Lynch; Kon-Well Wang; Hoon Sohn, Editor(s)
© SPIE. Terms of Use
