
Proceedings Paper
A comparison of region-based and pixel-based CEUS kinetics parameters in the assessment of arthritisFormat | Member Price | Non-Member Price |
---|---|---|
$17.00 | $21.00 |
Paper Abstract
Inflammatory rheumatic diseases are leading causes of disability and constitute a frequent medical disorder, leading to
inability to work, high comorbidity and increased mortality. The gold-standard for diagnosing and differentiating arthritis is
based on patient conditions and radiographic findings, as joint erosions or decalcification. However, early signs of arthritis are
joint effusion, hypervascularization and synovial hypertrophy. In particular, vascularization has been shown to correlate with
arthritis’ destructive behavior, more than clinical assessment.
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) examination of the small joints is emerging as a sensitive tool for assessing
vascularization and disease activity. The evaluation of perfusion pattern rely on subjective semi-quantitative scales, that are
able to capture the macroscopic degree of vascularization, but are unable to detect the subtler differences in kinetics perfusion
parameters that might lead to a deeper understanding of disease progression and a better management of patients.
Quantitative assessment is mostly performed by means of the Qontrast software package, that requires the user to define a
region of interest, whose mean intensity curve is fitted with an exponential function. We show that using a more
physiologically motivated perfusion curve, and by estimating the kinetics parameters separately pixel per pixel, the
quantitative information gathered is able to differentiate more effectively different perfusion patterns.
In particular, we will show that a pixel-based analysis is able to provide significant markers differentiating rheumatoid
arthritis from simil-rheumatoid psoriatic arthritis, that have non-significant differences in clinical evaluation (DAS28),
serological markers, or region-based parameters.
Paper Details
Date Published: 20 March 2014
PDF: 6 pages
Proc. SPIE 9040, Medical Imaging 2014: Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography, 90400F (20 March 2014); doi: 10.1117/12.2042801
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9040:
Medical Imaging 2014: Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography
Johan G. Bosch; Marvin M. Doyley, Editor(s)
PDF: 6 pages
Proc. SPIE 9040, Medical Imaging 2014: Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography, 90400F (20 March 2014); doi: 10.1117/12.2042801
Show Author Affiliations
E. Grisan, Univ. degli Studi di Padova (Italy)
Bernd Raffeiner, Univ. degli Studi di Padova (Italy)
General Hospital of Bolzano (Italy)
A. Coran, Casa Di Cura Giovanni XXIII (Italy)
Bernd Raffeiner, Univ. degli Studi di Padova (Italy)
General Hospital of Bolzano (Italy)
A. Coran, Casa Di Cura Giovanni XXIII (Italy)
Gaia Rizzo, University of Padova (Italy)
Luca Ciprian, Giovanni XXIII (Italy)
Roberto Stramare, Univ. degli Studi di Padova (Italy)
Luca Ciprian, Giovanni XXIII (Italy)
Roberto Stramare, Univ. degli Studi di Padova (Italy)
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9040:
Medical Imaging 2014: Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography
Johan G. Bosch; Marvin M. Doyley, Editor(s)
© SPIE. Terms of Use
