Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Studies of a suitable mask error enhancement factor for 2D patterns
Author(s): Chih I Wei; Yung Feng Cheng; Ming Jui Chen
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

In advanced 20nm and below technology nodes, the mask enhanced error factor (MEEF) plays an important rule due to the request of stable process control and quality of mask manufacture. It provides us an effective parameter to analyze the process window for lithography. In advanced nodes, MEEF criterion becomes more important than previous nodes because very tight process tolerance is requested, especially in OPC and mask capability control. Therefore, we have to do further studies on this topic. In the simple line/trench design layers (for example: Active and poly), the MEEF is easy to be defined because mask bias is isotropic. However, in the complicated two-dimensional (2D) design layers (for example: Contact and Mvia), they are hard to be defined a suitable definition of MEEF. In the first part, we used the global bias to calculate the MEEF on all patterns. It makes calculation easier to compare with other patterns which are different shapes. However, when we inspected the 2D line-end patterns on the wafer, we found the significant differences between the MEEF of wafer data and aerial simulation. In order to clarify this issue, we perform series simulation studies of the line-end MEEF. Then we knew that it came from the different bias strategies. Furthermore, the simulation studies show that the line-end MEEF of non-preferable orientation is very sensitive to mask X/Y ratio bias due to strong OAI optical behavior by the SMO source. As a result, a new point of view of 2D MEEF is suggested according to physical mask CD error measurement data. In this study, we would find a better description of the MEEF than traditional one for lithographic process development on 2D region.

Paper Details

Date Published: 12 April 2013
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 8683, Optical Microlithography XXVI, 868324 (12 April 2013); doi: 10.1117/12.2011509
Show Author Affiliations
Chih I Wei, United Microelectronics Corp. (Taiwan)
Yung Feng Cheng, United Microelectronics Corp. (Taiwan)
Ming Jui Chen, United Microelectronics Corp. (Taiwan)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8683:
Optical Microlithography XXVI
Will Conley, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?