
Proceedings Paper
Performance analysis of several generations of flat-panel x-ray imagers based on polycrystalline silicon TFTsFormat | Member Price | Non-Member Price |
---|---|---|
$17.00 | $21.00 |
Paper Abstract
Active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) have become ubiquitous in medical imaging environments. AMFPIs are
based on two-dimensional pixelated arrays coupled to various x-ray converter materials that provide either indirect or
direct detection of the incident x-ray radiation. However, the capabilities of this technology are severely constrained by
the underlying solid-state properties of the amorphous silicon semiconductor material employed in the thin-film
transistors present in each array pixel. The considerably higher electron and hole mobilities of polycrystalline silicon, a
semiconductor material that (like amorphous silicon) is well suited to fabrication of transistors for large area electronics,
provide the potential to overcome these constraints by increasing the overall gain of the system relative to the electronic
additive noise. To explore this potential, a series of prototype arrays based on increasingly complex pixel designs
employing polycrystalline silicon transistors is under development by our collaboration. The designs include several
generations of active pixel arrays that incorporate sophisticated pixel-level amplifier circuits with the goal of improving
imaging performance. In this paper, an initial analysis of the noise and DQE performance of selected prototype pixel
circuit designs will be presented. The results are based on a combination of Monte Carlo -based circuit simulations and
cascaded systems analysis, supplemented with information obtained from measurements performed on poly-Si
transistors. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of the potential for, and challenges associated with, the creation
of single photon counting arrays based on poly-Si TFTs.
Paper Details
Date Published: 19 March 2013
PDF: 9 pages
Proc. SPIE 8668, Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging, 86680A (19 March 2013); doi: 10.1117/12.2008324
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8668:
Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging
Robert M. Nishikawa; Bruce R. Whiting; Christoph Hoeschen, Editor(s)
PDF: 9 pages
Proc. SPIE 8668, Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging, 86680A (19 March 2013); doi: 10.1117/12.2008324
Show Author Affiliations
Larry E. Antonuk, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Youcef El-Mohri, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Qihua Zhao, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Martin Koniczek, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Albert Liang, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Youcef El-Mohri, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Qihua Zhao, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Martin Koniczek, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Albert Liang, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Hao Jiang, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
John McDonald, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Robert A. Street, Palo Alto Research Ctr. (United States)
Jeng-Ping Lu, Palo Alto Research Ctr. (United States)
John McDonald, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Robert A. Street, Palo Alto Research Ctr. (United States)
Jeng-Ping Lu, Palo Alto Research Ctr. (United States)
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8668:
Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging
Robert M. Nishikawa; Bruce R. Whiting; Christoph Hoeschen, Editor(s)
© SPIE. Terms of Use
