
Proceedings Paper
Improving whole-brain segmentations through incorporating regional image intensity statisticsFormat | Member Price | Non-Member Price |
---|---|---|
$17.00 | $21.00 |
Paper Abstract
Multi-atlas segmentation methods are among the most accurate approaches for the automatic labeling of magnetic resonance
(MR) brain images. The individual segmentations obtained through multi-atlas propagation can be combined using
an unweighted or locally weighted fusion strategy. Label overlaps can be further improved by refining the label sets based
on the image intensities using the Expectation-Maximisation (EM) algorithm. A drawback of these approaches is that
they do not consider knowledge about the statistical intensity characteristics of a certain anatomical structure, especially its
intensity variance. In this work we employ learned characteristics of the intensity distribution in various brain regions to improve
on multi-atlas segmentations. Based on the intensity profile within labels in a training set, we estimate a normalized
variance error for each structure. The boundaries of a segmented region are then adjusted until its intensity characteristics
are corrected for this variance error observed in the training sample. Specifically, we start with a high-probability “core”
segmentation of a structure, and maximise the similarity with the expected intensity variance by enlarging it. We applied
the method to 35 datasets of the OASIS database for which manual segmentations into 138 regions are available. We
assess the resulting segmentations by comparison with this gold-standard, using overlap metrics. Intensity-based statistical
correction improved similarity indices (SI) compared with EM-refined multi-atlas propagation from 75.6% to 76.2%
on average. We apply our novel correction approach to segmentations obtained through either a locally weighted fusion
strategy or an EM-based method and show significantly increased similarity indices.
Paper Details
Date Published: 13 March 2013
PDF: 7 pages
Proc. SPIE 8669, Medical Imaging 2013: Image Processing, 86691M (13 March 2013); doi: 10.1117/12.2006966
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8669:
Medical Imaging 2013: Image Processing
Sebastien Ourselin; David R. Haynor, Editor(s)
PDF: 7 pages
Proc. SPIE 8669, Medical Imaging 2013: Image Processing, 86691M (13 March 2013); doi: 10.1117/12.2006966
Show Author Affiliations
Christian Ledig, Imperial College London (United Kingdom)
Rolf A. Heckemann, The Neurodis Foundation (France)
Imperial College London (United Kingdom)
Rolf A. Heckemann, The Neurodis Foundation (France)
Imperial College London (United Kingdom)
Alexander Hammers, The Neurodis Foundation (France)
Imperial College London (United Kingdom)
Daniel Rueckert, Imperial College London (United Kingdom)
Imperial College London (United Kingdom)
Daniel Rueckert, Imperial College London (United Kingdom)
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8669:
Medical Imaging 2013: Image Processing
Sebastien Ourselin; David R. Haynor, Editor(s)
© SPIE. Terms of Use
