
Proceedings Paper
Non-invasive high-resolution tracking of human neuronal pathways: diffusion tensor imaging at 7T with 1.2 mm isotropic voxel sizeFormat | Member Price | Non-Member Price |
---|---|---|
$17.00 | $21.00 |
Paper Abstract
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) allows characterizing and exploiting diffusion anisotropy effects, thereby providing
important details about tissue microstructure. A major application in neuroimaging is the so-called fiber tracking where
neuronal connections between brain regions are determined non-invasively by DTI. Combining these neural pathways
within the human brain with the localization of activated brain areas provided by functional MRI offers important
information about functional connectivity of brain regions. However, DTI suffers from severe signal reduction due to the
diffusion-weighting. Ultra-high field (UHF) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should therefore be advantageous to
increase the intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This in turn enables to acquire high quality data with increased
resolution, which is beneficial for tracking more complex fiber structures. However, UHF MRI imposes some difficulties
mainly due to the larger B1 inhomogeneity compared to 3T MRI. We therefore optimized the parameters to perform DTI
at a 7 Tesla whole body MR scanner equipped with a high performance gradient system and a 32-channel head receive
coil. A Stesjkal Tanner spin-echo EPI sequence was used, to acquire 110 slices with an isotropic voxel-size of 1.2 mm
covering the whole brain. 60 diffusion directions were scanned which allows calculating the principal direction
components of the diffusion vector in each voxel. The results prove that DTI can be performed with high quality at UHF
and that it is possible to explore the SNT benefit of the higher field strength. Combining UHF fMRI data with UHF DTI
results will therefore be a major step towards better neuroimaging methods.
Paper Details
Date Published: 6 March 2013
PDF: 7 pages
Proc. SPIE 8668, Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging, 866846 (6 March 2013); doi: 10.1117/12.2006764
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8668:
Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging
Robert M. Nishikawa; Bruce R. Whiting; Christoph Hoeschen, Editor(s)
PDF: 7 pages
Proc. SPIE 8668, Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging, 866846 (6 March 2013); doi: 10.1117/12.2006764
Show Author Affiliations
Ralf Lützkendorf, Otto-von-Guericke-Univ. Magdeburg (Germany)
Frank Hertel, Otto-von-Guericke-Univ. Magdeburg (Germany)
Robin Heidemann, Siemens Healthcare Sector (Germany)
Andreas Thiel, OFFIS Oldenburg (Germany)
Michael Luchtmann, Otto-von-Guericke-Univ. Magdeburg (Germany)
Frank Hertel, Otto-von-Guericke-Univ. Magdeburg (Germany)
Robin Heidemann, Siemens Healthcare Sector (Germany)
Andreas Thiel, OFFIS Oldenburg (Germany)
Michael Luchtmann, Otto-von-Guericke-Univ. Magdeburg (Germany)
Markus Plaumann, Otto-von-Guericke-Univ. Magdeburg (Germany)
Jörg Stadler, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (Germany)
Sebastian Baecke, Otto-von-Guericke-Univ. Magdeburg (Germany)
Johannes Bernarding, Otto-von-Guericke-Univ. Magdeburg (Germany)
Jörg Stadler, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (Germany)
Sebastian Baecke, Otto-von-Guericke-Univ. Magdeburg (Germany)
Johannes Bernarding, Otto-von-Guericke-Univ. Magdeburg (Germany)
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8668:
Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging
Robert M. Nishikawa; Bruce R. Whiting; Christoph Hoeschen, Editor(s)
© SPIE. Terms of Use
