Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Machine-assisted human classification of segmented characters for OCR testing and training
Author(s): R. Allen Wilkinson; Michael D. Garris; Jon C. Geist
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

NIST needed a large set of segmented characters for use as a test set for the First Census Optical Character Recognition (OCR) Systems Conference. A machine-assisted human classification system was developed to expedite the process. The testing set consists of 58,000 digits and 10,000 upper and lower case characters entered on forms by high school students and is distributed as Testdata 1. A machine system was able to recognize a majority of the characters but all system decisions required human verification. The NIST recognition system was augmented with human verification to produce the testing database. This augmented system consists of several parts, the recognition system, a checking pass, a correcting pass, and a clean up pass. The recognition system was developed at NIST. The checking pass verifies that an image is in the correct class. The correcting pass allows classes to be changed. The clean-up pass forces the system to stabilize by making all images accepted with verified classifications or rejected. In developing the testing set we discovered that segmented characters can be ambiguous even without context bias. This ambiguity can be caused by over- segmentation or by the way a person writes. For instance, it is possible to create four ambiguous characters to represent all ten digits. This means that a quoted accuracy rate for a set of segmented characters is meaningless without reference to human performance on the same set of characters. This is different from the case of isolated fields where most of the ambiguity can be overcome by using context which is available in the non-segmented image. For instance, in the First Census OCR Conference, one system achieved a forced decision error rate for digits of 1.6% while 21 other systems achieved error rates of 3.2% to 5.1%. This statement cannot be evaluated until human performance on the same set of characters presented one at a time without context has been measured.

Paper Details

Date Published: 14 April 1993
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 1906, Character Recognition Technologies, (14 April 1993); doi: 10.1117/12.143622
Show Author Affiliations
R. Allen Wilkinson, National Institute of Standards and Technology (United States)
Michael D. Garris, National Institute of Standards and Technology (United States)
Jon C. Geist, National Institute of Standards and Technology (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 1906:
Character Recognition Technologies
Donald P. D'Amato, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?