 Astronomy
 Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
 Defense & Security
 Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
 Illumination & Displays
 Lasers & Sources
 Micro/Nano Lithography
 Nanotechnology
 Optical Design & Engineering
 Optoelectronics & Communications
 Remote Sensing
 Sensing & Measurement
 Solar & Alternative Energy
 Sign up for Newsroom EAlerts
 Information for:
Advertisers




Optoelectronics & Communications
Quantum metamaterials: a brave new world
Didier Felbacq and Mauro Antezza
Introducing quantum degrees of freedom opens new ways to control lightmatter interaction in artificial structures.
19 June 2012, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1201206.004296
Metamaterials are artificial, composite structures that present effective properties not encountered in natural materials. This broad definition can apply to many materials and types of properties. Consider, for instance, fiberreinforced cement, a composite medium, made of cement and metallic fibers, with mechanical properties that neither of its components possesses alone. This is a (mechanical) metamaterial. The kinds of properties that we will be interested in here relate not to mechanics, but to electromagnetic waves. That is, we consider metamaterials whose electromagnetic properties, permittivity and permeability, can be tailored. (There is a similar concept with phonons, i.e., phononic metamaterials.) The field of composite media in electromagnetics is a rather old one. However, it has greatly expanded in recent years, in particular through the concepts of negative index, cloaking, superlenses, and even plasmonics.
Various methods have been suggested to introduce quantum degrees of freedom. The use of metal in metamaterials and in plasmonics soon gave rise to the idea of inserting some gain inside these structures, which can be done by inserting quantum dots.^{1, 2} However, this approach uses quantum degrees of freedom not to modify the effective properties, but to compensate the losses. Somewhat differently, Plumridge and colleagues have shown the possibility of tailoring the anisotropic effective permittivity tensor of a layered medium doped by quantum wells.^{3} In recent work, Zagoskin and coworkers, who coined the term ‘quantum metamaterial,’ proposed using a set of charge qubits (an array of Josephson junctions).^{4} They showed that in such a system, a band gap can exist (depending on the microscopic quantum state of the qubits), resulting in a quantum photonic crystal. Another approach is to consider coupledatom optical cavities.^{5} These metamaterials can be used to design a reconfigurable superlens possessing a negative index gradient for singlephoton imaging.
Our approach to quantum metamaterials proceeds along two paths.^{6} The first kind of structure is a set of nanowires containing quantum dots, such as that depicted in Figure 1. Such a structure is interesting for several reasons: it is simple, it has many interesting properties (negative index, effective magnetism, alldielectric cloaking), and it can be experimentally realized fairly easily. Furthermore, the quantum dots have a dipole with a controllable orientation. Each nanorod can be characterized by its scattering matrix, which relates the diffracted field to the incident field. For a wavelength that is sufficiently large compared to the diameter of the nanorod, the diffracted field can be characterized by an electric dipole and a magnetic dipole. We have shown that, for H_{} polarized fields (i.e., magnetic fields parallel to the rods), the collective resonances of the microscopic magnetic dipoles induce an effective permeability (this remains true for dielectric spheres).^{7} We have also proved the existence of a negative permittivity and a negative permeability for E_{} fields.^{8} Now, the quantum dots inserted inside the nanorods allow control of the transverse dipole (the magnetic one for E_{} fields). By pumping the dots (see Figure 1), it is possible to switch this dipole on or off, opening or closing a conduction band (see Figure 2). This kind of structure thus possesses a quantum reconfigurable band structure.
Figure 1. Sketch of a quantum metamaterial made of an array of nanorods doped by quantum dots.
Figure 2. Transmission spectra of a quantum metamaterial made of nanorods with a switchable magnetic dipole when the dipole is on (black trace) and off (blue trace). λ/d: Wavelength over period ratio.
The second type of quantum metamaterial we are studying is made of artificial crystals of ultracold atoms, arranged periodically in optical traps, in what is called a Mott insulator state. Such artificial crystals have been realized in several laboratories, and exhibit a much larger periodicity than common crystals (of the order of a fraction of a micron). These quantum systems, whose extreme control and tunability allow their use as quantum clocks,^{9} show interesting interplays between the geometry of the lattice, the internal atomic structure, and the motional degrees of freedom of the atoms in their local trapping potential. In particular, we have shown that such structures may possess a full photonic band gap, as is the case for a fourlevel atomic structure arranged in a diamond lattice,^{10} or a twolevel atomic structure in a cubic lattice.^{11} However, a fourlevel atomic structure in a cubic lattice does not possess any full photonic band gap.^{11} In fact, we have shown that the opening or closing of a band depends on the interplay between the lattice geometry and the internal quantum structure. That a collective property such as the photonic band depends on a quantum number shows the merit of the concept of quantum metamaterials in this context of cold atoms. Remarkably, such artificial crystals have recently been used to produce a 1D photoniccrystal lasing medium, where multiple Bragg reflections and the presence of a cold atom cloud simultaneously provide gain and feedback.^{12}
In summary, we have proposed new ways to make metamaterials enter the quantum world. Inserting artificial atoms (quantum dots) into periodic nanostructures or arranging real atoms (ultracold gases) into artificial periodic lattices can open new possibilities for collective lightmatter behavior. In the future, we will study these new structures both experimentally (lattices of doped dielectric nanorods) and theoretically. By investigating several fundamental aspects linked to quantum fluctuations, we aim to reveal the existence of nontrivial collective phenomena resulting from hybridization of internal and global states.
Mauro Antezza acknowledges financial support from the Julian Schwinger Foundation.
Didier Felbacq, Mauro Antezza
Charles Coulomb Laboratory
CNRS and University of Montpellier 2 Montpellier, France http://www.coulomb.univmontp2.fr
Didier Felbacq is a member of the Institut Universitaire de France.
References:
1. S. Wuestner, A. Pusch, K. L. Tsakmakidis, J. M. Hamm, O. Hess, Overcoming losses with gain in a negative refractive index metamaterial, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, p. 127401, 2010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.127401
2. A. K. Sarychev, G. Tartakovsky, Magnetic plasmonic metamaterials in actively pumped host medium and plasmonic nanolaser, Phys. Rev. B 75, p. 085436, 2007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75.085436
3. J. Plumridge, E. Clarke, R. Murray, C. Phillips, Ultrastrong coupling effects with quantum metamaterials, Solid State Commun. 146(910), p. 406408, 2008. doi:10.1016/j.ssc.2008.03.027
4. A. L. Rakhmanov, A. M. Zagoskin, S. Savel'ev, F. Nori, Quantum metamaterials: electromagnetic waves in a Josephson qubit line, Phys. Rev. B 77, p. 144507, 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.77.144507
5. J. Q. Quach, C.H. Su, A. M. Martin, A. D. Greentree, L. C. L. Hollenberg, Reconfigurable quantum metamaterials, Opt. Express 19(12), p. 1101811033, 2011. doi:10.1364/OE.19.011018
8. K. Vynck, D. Felbacq, E. Centeno, A. I. Căbuz, D. Cassagne, B. Guizal, Alldielectric rodtype metamaterials at optical frequencies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, p. 133901, 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.133901
9. T. Akatsuka, M. Takamoto, H. Katori, Optical lattice clocks with noninteracting bosons and fermions, Nat. Phys. 4(12), p. 954959, 2008. doi:10.1038/nphys1108
10. M. Antezza, Y. Castin, FanoHopfield model and photonic band gaps for an arbitrary atomic lattice, Phys. Rev. A 80, p. 013816, 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.80.013816
12. A. Schilke, C. Zimmermann, P. W. Courteille, W. Guerin, Optical parametric oscillation with distributed feedback in cold atoms, Nat. Photon. 6(2), p. 101104, 2012. doi:10.1038/NPHOTON.2011.320


