SPIE Membership Get updates from SPIE Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
  • Astronomy
  • Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
  • Defense & Security
  • Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
  • Illumination & Displays
  • Lasers & Sources
  • Micro/Nano Lithography
  • Nanotechnology
  • Optical Design & Engineering
  • Optoelectronics & Communications
  • Remote Sensing
  • Sensing & Measurement
  • Solar & Alternative Energy
  • Sign up for Newsroom E-Alerts
  • Information for:
SPIE Photonics West 2019 | Register Today

SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing 2019 | Register Today

2019 SPIE Optics + Photonics | Call for Papers



Print PageEmail PageView PDF

Lasers & Sources

Choosing a geometry

The optimal configuration of integrating sphere entrance port, photodiode, and collecting fiber varies with data requirements.

From oemagazine August 2003
31 August 2003, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.5200308.0011

To collect only uniform sphere-wall radiance, position the detector with its optical axis perpendicular to the entrance port optical axis.

Optical power and peak wavelength are of particular importance in diode laser characterization. The obvious approach is to slap a photodiode and fiber-coupled wavelength measurement device on a baffle-free integrating sphere, perform calibration, and start measuring. Unfortunately, it's not that simple. If you want to have confidence in your measurements, you must give careful consideration to location of the diode laser, photodiode, and fiber.

A diode laser emits radiation in an ellipse. The diode laser should be close enough to the integrating sphere that the sphere collects the emitted optical flux, yet far enough away to minimize back reflection. This distance is typically dictated by the geometric constraints of the test bench. Another consideration is the size of the entrance port of the integrating sphere. The port must be large enough to collect the total emitted flux from the laser under test. Remember, entrance port size drives sphere diameter; a good rule of thumb is not to exceed a port fractional area of 5%.

Based on the optical flux Φλ introduced into the integrating sphere wall, we can estimate radiance L using

where Φλ is the input flux, ρλ is the sphere wall reflectance factor, As is the sphere area, and f j is the sphere port fractional area. We can measure peak wavelength by adding a fiber port to the integrating sphere in addition to the photodiode. To ensure flux input reproducibility, position the fiber such that it collects uniform radiance; in other words, ensure the beam spot of the diode laser (first-strike radiance) on the sphere wall does not fall within the numerical aperture of the fiber. This geometry involves trade-offs, the most important being reduced optical efficiency. In this case, we can estimate the flux Φf incident on a fiber of area Af as

f = LAf ¼ (NA)2

Because peak wavelength measurements do not always require uniform irradiance on the fiber end face, we can increase optical coupling efficiency by positioning the fiber to view the wall of the integrating sphere that sees first-strike radiance. The flux incident on the fiber in this geometry can be estimated as

where E is the irradiance on the sphere wall. This configuration can effectively increase the optical efficiency by a factor of six for the same sphere diameter and wall coating. In many cases, however, it is still not efficient enough for measurements with the 62.5-µm-diameter fibers typical for spectrum analyzers and wavemeters.

This leads us to a third alternative, which is positioning the fiber opposite the sphere entrance port. In this geometry the flux incident on the fiber is

f = EAf

Placing the fiber opposite the entrance port comes with a trade-off, however. A photodiode is mounted on the integrating sphere to measure the radiant flux from the diode laser entering the sphere. Unlike the case of a fiber, a photodiode mounted on an integrating sphere for optical radiation measurements must be positioned to collect only integrated radiance. One way to achieve this condition is to place the detector forward and with its optical axis perpendicular to the entrance port optical axis (see figure). That gives us a flux incident on the detector of

Φd = LAd ¼ sin2θ

where Φd is the flux incident on the detector, Ad is the detector active area, and θ is the half-angle field of view. Another option is to place the photodiode behind an optical diffuser mounted flush with the sphere wall, in which case the flux incident on the detector is

Φd = TLAd ¼ sin2θ

where T is the diffuser transmission.

To ensure the optimal measurement for your application, you should consider the advantages and trade-offs of the various integrating sphere and component geometries presented and determine the best option. oe

Greg McKee
Greg McKee is manager of applications engineering at Labsphere Inc., Sutton, NH.