SPIE Membership Get updates from SPIE Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
  • Astronomy
  • Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
  • Defense & Security
  • Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
  • Illumination & Displays
  • Lasers & Sources
  • Micro/Nano Lithography
  • Nanotechnology
  • Optical Design & Engineering
  • Optoelectronics & Communications
  • Remote Sensing
  • Sensing & Measurement
  • Solar & Alternative Energy
  • Sign up for Newsroom E-Alerts
  • Information for:
    Advertisers
SPIE Photonics West 2018 | Call for Papers

OPIE 2017

OPIC 2017

SPIE Journals OPEN ACCESS

SPIE PRESS

SPIE PRESS




Print PageEmail PageView PDF

Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging

Computational imaging for 3D micrographs with 10-fold depth-of-field enhancement

Complementary kernel matching greatly increases the depth of field for time-resolved 3D ranging and snapshot imaging, and shows promise for applications ranging from biomedical microscopy to machine vision.
7 March 2017, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1201611.006749

The state-of-the-art microscopes that are found in today's scientific and industrial facilities benefit from a century of scientific innovations, underpinned by cutting-edge technologies such as ultrasensitive cameras and intense, agile light sources. The fundamental approach to imaging, however, is unchanged from the principles that were used in the 17th century—e.g., by Galileo, Hooke, and Leeuwenhoek—in the construction of instruments that eventually became the compound microscope. The focus today remains on engineering optical elements to optimally focus light from the sample to form a sharp image at a single plane. In this traditional approach to imaging, a specific sample plane (which is imaged to the camera plane) is inherently defined so that objects not located exactly in the sample plane are out of focus. In high-resolution microscopy, the depth of field (DOF) over which a sharp image is recorded is typically a micrometer or less, which offers the benefit of optical sectioning (i.e., the ability to produce clear images of focal planes within a thick sample). However, samples that exceed the DOF of a microscope are the norm, which means it is necessary refocus the image throughout its depth to build a clear picture.

Purchase SPIE Field Guide to MicroscopyIn the first computational solution to this dilemma (developed by Gerd Häusler), a single image was recorded as the sample was swept through the plane of best focus, and a time-consuming coherent optical processor was subsequently used to recover a sharp image.1 In a modern approach commonly used by microscopists, a ‘Z-stack’ of up to 100 images are recorded and combined computationally into a single sharp image with an extended DOF. Other more sophisticated techniques have been developed for high-resolution 3D microscopy, such as light-sheet fluorescence microscopy, confocal/multiphoton microscopy, and localization super-resolution microscopy (although the latter two are not strictly 3D techniques in themselves). Due to their scanning nature, however, none of these techniques can be used for snapshot or video-rate imaging.

We have developed a new approach, called complementary kernel matching (CKM),2 that can be used to extend the DOF by a factor of 10 in a single snapshot, thus enabling its use for time-resolved or video-rate microscopy. Furthermore, 3D ranging of the sample is achieved simultaneously in our technique. An example of extended-DOF 3D micrographs obtained with CKM are compared with conventional microscopy images in Figure 1. We also compare a CKM reconstruction (from one snapshot) with an image derived from a Z-stack in Figure 2.


Figure 1. Images obtained with (a) our computational complementary kernel matching (CKM) technique, compared with (b) conventional microscopy, acquired in a single snapshot. Left: Images of lily flower pollen grains obtained in fluorescence. Right: Images of an irregular brass surface. Both CKM samples exceed the depth of field (DOF) of a conventional microscope.

Figure 2. Comparison of images obtained using our CKM technique with those obtained using more traditional methods. (a) Reconstruction from a focal stack (i.e., Z-stack) of 100 images, each focusing at a different depth such that the combination is all in focus. (b) The result of a CKM reconstruction, acquired with a single snapshot, which yields results comparable to those of a Z-stack. (c) A single image, obtained with conventional microscopy focused at mid-height, in which areas of the image are outside of the microscope's DOF and thus appear out of focus.

CKM—a computational imaging technique—involves optical encoding of the captured image, as well as digital decoding that is used to reconstruct a sharp output image. We achieve optical encoding by using a phase plate at the aperture of the microscope objective and capturing two distinct images with complementary information. In one such implementation of CKM (see Figure 3), a microscope is equipped with the CKM-encoding element (i.e., a phase plate) and a CKM-splitting element (consisting of a beam splitter, and mirrors to replicate the desired image) that separates the two encoded images onto a single camera to realize snapshot operation.3, 4


Figure 3. Illustration of CKM implementation in a microscope. Left: CKM encoding and splitting optical elements are installed at the objective and in front of the sensor, respectively (image courtesy of ZEISS). The sensor acquires a single-coded frame that contains two images. Post-detection image processing is then used to reconstruct the image with an extended DOF and 3D information.

Our use of a phase plate with a cubic profile provides the desired DOF extension. It also means that all spatial frequencies up to the optical cut-off—i.e., providing a modulation-transfer function (MTF) without nulls in the passband—are simultaneously transmitted. This makes image deconvolution by MTF inversion possible. In addition, the shape of the point spread function (PSF) of a cubic-phase wavefront is preserved over larger depth distances than for a conventional diffraction-limited spot, which thereby allows us to extend the DOF. Furthermore, the PSF produces a lateral shift that varies quadratically with defocus.5 This lateral shift is relatively innocuous for a single image and has therefore been largely ignored in the past.6 With CKM, however, we exploit this translation to infer defocus and to enable high-quality image recovery and range estimation. We use the differential shift between the two images to uniquely determine the depth map of the scene and to enable optimal image recovery with 3D ranging. It is this ability to simultaneously range with an extended DOF that enables high-quality imaging. The results of this approach are thus free of the artifacts that have previously plagued extended-DOF computational imaging.7

In summary, we have developed an imaging technique that provides a new capability for capturing, in a single snapshot, high-quality range-resolved images with a DOF that is an order of magnitude greater than that of a conventional microscope. Furthermore, we have demonstrated this technique in different imaging modalities, such as fluorescence, bright-field transmission, and bright-field reflection. Our future work will focus on accommodating CKM into a range of applications that require its unique properties, including particle image velocimetry, super-resolution microscopy, industrial inspection without moving parts, tracking of particles or small objects (such as molecules), and 3D machine vision for high-resolution applications.


Guillem Carles, Paul Zammit, Andrew R. Harvey
University of Glasgow
Glasgow, United Kingdom

References:
1. G. Häusler, A method to increase the depth of focus by two step image processing, Opt. Commun. 6, p. 38-42, 1972. doi:10.1016/0030-4018(72)90243-X
2. P. Zammit, A. R. Harvey, G. Carles, Extended depth-of-field imaging and ranging in a snapshot, Optica 1, p. 209-216, 2014. doi:10.1364/OPTICA.1.000209
3. P. Zammit, A. R. Harvey, G. Carles, Practical single snapshot 3D imaging method with an extended depth of field, Proc. Imag. Appl. Opt., p. CT2E.2, 2015. doi:10.1364/COSI.2015.CT2E.2
4. P. Zammit, G. Carles, A. R. Harvey, Three-dimensional imaging and ranging in a snapshot with an extended depth-of-field, Proc. Imag. Appl. Opt., p. CW2D1, 2016. doi:10.1364/COSI.2016.CW2D.1
5. G. Carles, Analysis of the cubic-phase wavefront-coding function: physical insight and selection of optimal coding strength, Opt. Laser Eng. 50, p. 1377-1382, 2012. doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2012.05.014
6. E. R. Dowski, W. T. Cathey, Extended depth of field through wave-front coding, Appl. Opt. 34, p. 1859-1866, 1995. doi:10.1364/AO.34.001859
7. M. Demenikov, A. R. Harvey, Image artifacts in hybrid imaging systems with a cubic phase mask, Opt. Express 18, p. 8207-8212, 2010. doi:10.1364/OE.18.008207