• Newsroom Home
  • Astronomy
  • Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
  • Defense & Security
  • Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
  • Illumination & Displays
  • Lasers & Sources
  • Micro/Nano Lithography
  • Nanotechnology
  • Optical Design & Engineering
  • Optoelectronics & Communications
  • Remote Sensing
  • Sensing & Measurement
  • Solar & Alternative Energy
  • Sign up for Newsroom E-Alerts
  • Information for:
    Advertisers
SPIE Photonics West 2018 | Register Today

SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing 2018 | Call for Papers

SPIE Photonics Europe 2018 | Call for Papers

SPIE Journals OPEN ACCESS

SPIE PRESS

SPIE PRESS

Print PageEmail PageView PDF

Nanotechnology

Novel magnetostrain-driven quantum engine

A quantum heat engine can be realized by subjecting a single layer of graphene to a combination of an external magnetic field and mechanical strain.
30 August 2016, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1201608.006684

A quantum heat engine (QHEN) is a nanoscale device that enables the conversion of heat to useful work. In these open systems—analogs of classical engines—a 'working substance' that has quantum mechanical properties undergoes a cycle of sequential transformations.1–8 From a practical point of view, QHENs represent an opportunity for nanoscale energy harvesting. Indeed, a number of practical examples and applications of the QHEN concept have previously been described in the literature. For example, photosynthesis in plants9 and light harvesting with human-designed photocells4, 5 are familiar examples of the process, where thermalized photons are the working substance. In addition, a number of different designs, based on various principles, have been proposed. These include entangled states in a qubit,10 as well as quantum mechanical versions of the diesel6 and Otto cycles (i.e., the operating principles of diesel-fueled and gasoline-fueled car engines, respectively).7, 11–13 In general, idealized reciprocating QHENs involve a stationary limit cycle3, 14 consisting of a sequence of intermediate equilibrium states that can be described microscopically by a density matrix operator that depends on a minimal set of macroscopic variables.14, 15

Purchase Nanotechnology: A Crash CourseAs part of these developments, we have recently proposed a magnetically driven QHEN that combines the effects of a parabolic confining potential (which can be provided by a semiconductor quantum dot) with an external magnetic field.15, 16 In this work, we make use of this general concept and analyze a magnetostrain-driven QHEN.17, 18 In particular, we show that the unique electronic and mechanical properties of single-layer graphene (i.e., a graphene flake) combined with an external magnetic field and controlled mechanical strain can be used to construct a QHEN.

In graphene, the presence of certain shear strain patterns leads to the emergence of a gauge field (as described by effective Dirac continuum theory) whose curl represents a pseudomagnetic field.19–23 Interestingly, realistic experimental values of strain can lead to extremely large (>100T) values of the associated pseudomagnetic field (as evidenced by the emergence of effective relativistic Landau levels).22 In practice, however, it is difficult to modulate the strain pattern with extreme precision. Nevertheless, we can tune the confining length scale by imposing a real external magnetic field, which can be controlled with high precision.15, 17 Our method of superposing shear strain and an externally controlled magnetic field therefore provides a suitable system for generating a magnetostrain-driven reciprocating QHEN.

To analyze the operation of our QHEN, we can consider an ensemble of single-particle systems whose microscopic configurations are described by a density matrix operator. Furthermore, as in a classical heat engine, we treat an idealization of the operating cycle as a sequence of quasi-static processes, where the system is arbitrarily close to equilibrium. The system can thus be described by an equilibrium density matrix operator, and the ensemble-averaged energy and entropy can be defined accordingly. For a quasi-static process—induced by modifying a given parameter in the system (e.g., the magnetic field)—we can use a microscopic formulation of the first law of thermodynamics (i.e., which is applicable to a nanoscale system) to identify the heat and work exchanged.

For example, we have considered a graphene flake that is subjected to an external magnetic field (normal to the plane of the flake) and to mechanical strain.17 The latter induces a gauge field, which corresponds to a pseudomagnetic field that is also normal to the plane. We were thus able to obtain the exact single-particle spectrum for these conditions.17 For a Gibbsian ensemble, we can analytically calculate the partition function from this exact spectrum, and we can directly obtain the internal energy and entropy from the expression of the partition function.

Our proposed QHEN cycle (see Figure 1) is composed of two isoentropic trajectories and two trajectories in a constant magnetic field. Along each trajectory, we can calculate (using our nanoscale formulation of the first law of thermodynamics) the heat and work exchanged by the system, given the temperature of the source and drain thermal reservoirs.17 Lastly, we can use a parametrization of the QHEN efficiency in terms of the compression ratio to define the thermal efficiency of the engine (see Figure 2).17 This compression ratio represents the ratio of the Landau radii, which characterize the effective spatial localization of the Landau spinor solutions for a given total magnetic field.17 Remarkably, our thermal efficiency expression is directly analogous to the efficiency of a classical Otto cycle (i.e., where the compression ratio is defined in terms of the length of the piston that confines the classical fluid).


Figure 1. Schematic illustration of our magnetostrain graphene flake quantum heat engine (QHEN) cycle, in terms of entropy (S) and the imposed magnetic field (B). Black arrows indicate the flow of work (W), red arrows represent the direction of heat flow (Q), and green arrows indicate the direction of each of the four processes that constitute the cyclic operation of the engine. THand TC: Temperature of the source (hot) and drain (cold) thermal reservoirs, respectively. Along the horizontal lines, B increases (right arrow) or decreases (left arrow) between B1and B2, while S is kept constant. Along the vertical lines S increases (up arrow) or decreases (down arrow) because of heat exchange with the reservoirs when TH >TC, while B is kept constant.

Figure 2. Efficiency (η) of our QHEN, as a function of the compression ratio, r(B2). The dashed horizontal (red) line represents the Carnot limit (ηc). In this case, B1 (see Figure 1) is 4T, the pseudomagnetic field imposed on the graphene flake by the applied mechanical strain is 20T, and TH and TCare 100 and 30K, respectively. The blue and green lines represent different levels of pseudo-Zeeman coupling , where μB denotes the Bohr magneton.

In summary, we have proposed a novel quantum heat engine that works by imposing an external magnetic field and a controlled mechanical strain on a graphene flake. As part of our proof-of-principle study, we calculated the theoretical quasi-static limit of the efficiency of this engine. Our results indicate that it follows a simple formula, which constitutes a quantum mechanical version of the Otto cycle. Our QHEN configuration also acts as a conceptual prototype for a nanoscale device suitable for thermal-energy harvesting. In our future work, we will study the effect of many-body interactions in the system.

The authors acknowledge financial support from Conicyt-Fondecyt (1141146).


Enrique Muñoz
Pontifical Catholic University of Chile
Santiago, Chile

Enrique Muñoz has a PhD in physics (2008) and a PhD in bioengineering (2008), both from Rice University. Subsequently, he was a postdoctoral associate at the Mechanical Engineering Department of Rice University. He has been an associate professor since 2012.

Francisco J. Peña
Pontifical Catholic University of Chile
Santiago, Chile
and
Pontificial Catholic University of Valparaíso
Valparaíso, Chile


References:
1. C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody, B. K. Meister, Entropy and temperature of a quantum Carnot engine, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 458, p. 1519-1526, 2002.
2. J. Wang, J. He, Optimization on a three-level heat engine working with two noninteracting fermions in a one-dimensional box trap, J. Appl. Phys. 111, p. 043505, 2012. doi:10.1063/1.3681295
3. H. T. Quan, Y.-X. Liu, C. P. Sun, F. Nori, Quantum thermodynamic cycles and quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. E 76, p. 031105, 2007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.76.031105
4. M. O. Scully, M. S. Zubairy, G. S. Agarwal, H. Walther, Extracting work from a single heat bath via vanishing quantum coherence, Science 299, p. 862-864, 2003.
5. M. O. Scully, K. R. Chapin, K. E. Dorfman, M. B. Kim, A. Svidzinsky, Quantum heat engine power can be increased by noise-induced coherence, Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 108, p. 15097-15100, 2011.
6. C. D. Dong, G. Lefkidis, W. Hübner, Magnetic quantum diesel engine in Ni2, Phys. Rev. B 88, p. 214421, 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.88.214421
7. W. Hübner, G. Lefkidis, C. D. Dong, D. Chaudhuri, L. Chotorlishvili, J. Berakdar, Spin-dependent Otto quantum heat engine based on a molecular substance, Phys. Rev. B 90, p. 024401, 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.024401
8. P. P. Hofer, J.-R. Souquet, A. A. Clerk, Quantum heat engine based on photon-assisted Cooper pair tunneling, Phys. Rev. B , p. 041418(R), 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.93.041418
9. K. E. Dorfman, D. V. Voronine, S. Mukamel, M. O. Scully, Photosynthetic reaction center as a quantum heat engine, Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 110, p. 2746-2751, 2013.
10. X. L. Huang, H. Xu, X. Y. Niu, Y. D. Fu, A special entangled quantum heat engine based on the two-qubit Heisenberg XX model, Phys. Scripta 88, p. 065008, 2013. doi:10.1088/0031-8949/88/06/065008
11. H. Li, J. Zou, W.-L. Yu, B.-M. Xu, B. Shao, Negentropy as a source of efficiency: a nonequilibrium quantum Otto cycle, Euro. Phys. J. D 67, p. 134, 2013. doi:10.1140/epjd/e2013-30763-8
12. J. Roßnagel, O. Abah, F. Schmidt-Kaler, K. Singer, E. Lutz, Nanoscale heat engine beyond the Carnot limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, p. 030602, 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.030602
13. B. Leggio, M. Antezza, Otto engine beyond its standard quantum limit, Phys. Rev. E 93, p. 022122, 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.93.022122
14. T. Feldmann, R. Kosloff, Characteristics of the limit cycle of a reciprocating quantum heat engine, Phys. Rev. E 70, p. 046110, 2004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.70.046110
15. E. Muñoz, F. J. Peña, A. González, Magnetically-driven quantum heat engines: the quasi-static limit of their efficiency, Entropy 18, p. 173, 2016. doi:10.3390/e18050173
16. E. Muñoz, F. J. Peña, Magnetically driven quantum heat engine, Phys. Rev. E 89, p. 052107, 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.89.052107
17. F. J. Peña, E. Muñoz, Magnetostrain-driven quantum engine on a graphene flake, Phys. Rev. E 91, p. 052152, 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.91.052152
18. E. Muñoz, F. J. Peña, Magneto-strain driven quantum engine on a graphene flake. Presented at SPIE Optics + Photonics 2016.
19. A. H. C. Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, p. 109, 2009. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.109
20. F. Guinea, M. I. Katsnelson, A. K. Geim, Energy gaps and zero-field quantum Hall effect in graphene by strain engineering, Nat. Phys. 6, p. 30-33, 2010.
21. F. Guinea, A. K. Geim, M. I. Katsnelson, K. S. Novoselov, Generating quantizing pseudomagnetic fields by bending graphene ribbons, Phys. Rev. B 81, p. 035408, 2010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.035408
22. N. Levy, S. A. Burke, K. L. Meaker, M. Panlasigui, A. Zettl, F. Guinea, A. H. C. Neto, M. F. Crommie, Strain-induced pseudo-magnetic fields greater than 300 tesla in graphene nanobubbles, Science 329, p. 544-547, 2010.
23. F. de Juan, J. L. Mañes, M. A. H. Vozmediano, Gauge fields from strain in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 87, p. 165131, 2013. doi:10.1103.PhysRevB.87.165131