SPIE Startup Challenge 2015 Founding Partner - JENOPTIK Get updates from SPIE Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
  • Astronomy
  • Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
  • Defense & Security
  • Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
  • Illumination & Displays
  • Lasers & Sources
  • Micro/Nano Lithography
  • Nanotechnology
  • Optical Design & Engineering
  • Optoelectronics & Communications
  • Remote Sensing
  • Sensing & Measurement
  • Solar & Alternative Energy
  • Sign up for Newsroom E-Alerts
  • Information for:
OPIE 2017

OPIC 2017

SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing 2017 | Register Today

2017 SPIE Optics + Photonics | Call for Papers




Print PageEmail PageView PDF

Solar & Alternative Energy

Photothermal effect of conducting polymer electrodes for hybrid energy harvester

A hybrid energy harvester combining photovoltaic, pyroelectric, and thermoelectric devices enables use of the full solar spectrum to generate electricity.
21 May 2016, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1201604.006377

Solar energy harvesting research has largely concentrated on photovoltaic conversion, that is, generating electricity from light. To increase electricity outputs, researchers have experimented with hybridized energy conversion methods, such as solar cells that convert mechanical vibration into electricity.1, 2  Sunlight also contains heat, a potential source of additional energy. Using photothermal conversion to generate electricity from superfluous heat through pyroelectric or thermoelectric conversion could provide an effective path to harvesting abundant solar heat.

Purchase Polymer Photovoltaics: A Practical ApproachOther efforts to harvest solar heat, such as hybrid solar cells with thermoelectric modules or solar selective absorbers, have shown an increase in energy collection, but energy conversion and heat collection were not optimized. Furthermore, the hybrid harvesters have been bulky. In this work, we use a hybrid energy harvester with a photothermal layer—a thin polymer film combined with a pyroelectric polymer film—to collect solar heat.

The hybrid energy harvester (see Figure 1) in this work collects solar heat using photothermal,3 pyroelectric,4 and thermoelectric5 methods combined with a solar cell.6 It consists of a dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC), a pyroelectric film device, and a thermoelectric device. We also built circuitry composed of capacitors, switches, and a diode bridge rectifier to operate an LED lamp and electrochromic display (ECD) device. The rectifier converted the pyroelectric film device output (AC to DC), which was then stored in a capacitor (47mF, 25V) used to turn on the LED lamp. A second capacitor (10F, 5.4V) stored output energy generated by the series-connected photovoltaic and thermoelectric modules and drove the ECD.

Figure 1. Energy harvesting and storage circuitry diagram consisting of an LED lamp, capacitors, switches, and an electrochromic display (ECD) device (insets show photographic images of ECD switching operation and an LED lit up). DSSC: Dye-sensitized solar cell. PVDF-TrFE: Poly(vinylidenefluoride-co-trifluoroethylene) film. PEDOT: Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) electrode.

The DSSC converts UV and some of the visible light into electricity, letting near-IR (NIR) and the remaining visible light through. To reuse this light, we prepared a pyroelectric poly(vinylidenefluoride-co-trifluoroethylene) (PVDF-TrFE)7 film with highly conductive and photothermal poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) electrodes. To confirm the photothermal effect of the PEDOT electrodes, we varied the number of PEDOT film layers on PVDF-TrFE film, as shown in Figure 2(a): a bare PVDF-TrFE film (P0), one PEDOT layer (P1), and two PEDOT layers coated on both sides of PVDF-TrFE film (P2). The film with two PEDOT layers absorbed more NIR and had a temperature increase of more than 10K: see Figure 2(b). We conclude from light spectra of the sample that the PEDOT electrode layers drove the photothermal effect.

Figure 2. (a) Schematic and near-IR (NIR) thermal images of the photothermal samples. (b) UV-visible-NIR spectra of the films with different photothermal active layers (inset shows a photograph of samples). P0: Bare PVDF-TrFE film. P1: One PEDOT layer. P2: Two PEDOT layers coated on both sides of PVDF-TrFE film. a.u.: Absorbance units.

Pyroelectric devices typically use metallic electrodes due to their high conductivity, but metallic electrodes also reflect input light (see Figure 3). On the other hand, PEDOT electrodes absorb light transmitted through a DSSC without much reflection, and generate heat through photothermal conversion of otherwise wasted input light. We then use the heat generated by the photothermal conversion in the PEDOT electrodes to generate pyroelectric output, and a thermoelectric device attached below the pyroelectric film converts unused heat into electricity. Figure 3(b) and (c) shows that output energy from the thermoelectric device depends on light intensity.

Figure 3. (a) Schematic image of the efficient photothermal effect of conducting polymer electrodes in the pyroelectric and thermoelectric hybrid device. (b) Output voltage and (c) output current of the photothermally driven thermoelectric module versus NIR source intensity. (d) Output voltage of the photothermally driven pyroelectric film device. (e) Output voltage of the pyroelectric device (black line) and thermoelectric device (red line) and total output voltage from the hybrid energy harvester (blue line) under NIR irradiation.

Figure 4(a) shows the hybrid harvester structure in detail. We sandwiched the photothermal/pyroelectric film device between a DSSC and a thermoelectric module. Figure 4(b) shows the photocurrent density-voltage (J-V) curve of the hybrid device, including a series-connected photovoltaic cell. We confirmed the photothermal effect from the enhanced photoconversion efficiency (PCE), which was 15–20% higher than that of the DSSC only. In addition, higher light intensity led to a higher temperature gradient and a PCE increase of 41.3%: see Figure 4(c).

Figure 4. (a) Schematic image of the hybrid energy harvester (photovoltaic, photothermally driven pyroelectric, and thermoelectric devices). (b) Comparison of photocurrent density-voltage (J-V) characteristic curves of the photovoltaic and photothermally driven thermoelectric hybrid module. (c) Conversion efficiency comparison plot and increase (%) of the hybrid device efficiency versus light intensity.

Hybrid energy conversion based on multilayering of PEDOTs provides a deeper understanding of energy harvesting mechanisms and a method for boosting efficiency in a simpler structure. Our next step is to build a self-powered smart window system using the hybrid energy harvester. The photothermal polymer film is essential for converting wasted light into a useful heat source, and we anticipate that the output voltage and energy conversion efficiency would be enough for an electrochromic window. An integrated system of window, energy harvester, energy storage, switching, and circuits will be further optimized to decrease energy loss by the integration. A further challenge is to achieve a flexible self-powered smart-film device out of these efforts.

Eunkyoung Kim, Teahoon Park, Jongbeom Na, Byeonggwan Kim, Younghoon Kim, Haijin Shin
Yonsei University
Seoul, South Korea

Eunkyoung Kim has been a professor at Yonsei University since 2004.

1. Y. Yang, H. Zhang, J. Chen, S. Lee, T.-C. Hou, Z. L. Wang, Simultaneously harvesting mechanical and chemical energies by a hybrid cell for self-powered biosensors and personal electronics, Energy Environ. Sci. 6, p. 1744-1749, 2013.
2. Y. Yang, H. Zhang, Y. Liu, Z.-H. Lin, S. Lee, Z. Lin, C. P. Wong, Z. L. Wang, Silicon-based hybrid energy cell for self-powered electrodegradation and personal electronics, ACS Nano (7), p. 2808-2813, 2013.
B. Kim, H. Shin, T. Park, H. Lim, E. Kim, NIR-sensitive poly(3,4-ethylenedioxyselenophene) derivatives for transparent photo-thermo-electric converters, Adv. Mater. 25, p. 5483-5489, 2013.
4. C. R. Bowen, C. R. Taylor, E. LeBoulbar, D. Zabek, A. Chauhan, R. Vaish, Pyroelectric materials and devices for energy harvesting applications, Energy Environ. Sci. 7, p. 3836-3856, 2014.
5. T. Park, C. Park, B. Kim, H. Shin, E. Kim, Flexible PEDOT electrodes with large thermoelectric power factors to generate electricity by the touch of fingertips, Energy Environ. Sci 6, p. 788-792, 2013.
6. T. Park, J. Na, B. Kim, Y. Kim, H. Shin, E. Kim, Photothermally activated pyroelectric polymer films for harvesting of solar heat with a hybrid energy cell structure, ACS Nano 9, p. 11830-11839, 2015.
7. T. Park, B. Kim, Y. Kim, E. Kim, Highly conductive PEDOT electrodes for harvesting dynamic energy through piezoelectric conversion, J. Mater. Chem. A 2, p. 5462-5469, 2014.