SPIE Membership Get updates from SPIE Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
  • Astronomy
  • Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
  • Defense & Security
  • Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
  • Illumination & Displays
  • Lasers & Sources
  • Micro/Nano Lithography
  • Nanotechnology
  • Optical Design & Engineering
  • Optoelectronics & Communications
  • Remote Sensing
  • Sensing & Measurement
  • Solar & Alternative Energy
  • Sign up for Newsroom E-Alerts
  • Information for:
SPIE Photonics West 2018 | Call for Papers

OPIE 2017

OPIC 2017




Print PageEmail PageView PDF

Defense & Security

Chemical sensing with wireless optical remote sensor networks

A miniature wireless optical remote chemical sensing network improves the accuracy of mid-wave and long-wave IR chemical detection.
8 February 2016, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1201602.006347

Optical remote chemical sensing is one of the most efficient noncontact sensing technologies. Many chemicals show molecular rotational-vibrational absorption in the mid-wave and long-wave IR (MWIR/LWIR, 3–12μm), and multispectral sensing in these regions can enable chemical measurement and identification in real time and with high reliability. This approach avoids equipment contamination, and allows continuous chemical monitoring without deabsorption or replacement of sensing materials. It also enables effective chemical detection over a broad area, in contrast with most current chemical ‘ sniffers,’ where sensing is limited by the physical location of the sensors. Furthermore, the photodetectors used for multispectral chemical sensing have a fast response (in the order of microseconds), which enables real-time measurements.

Purchase SPIE Field Guide to IR Systems, Detectors and FPAsOptical remote sensing networks with multiple distributed MWIR/LWIR remote chemical sensors connected in a wireless network can significantly improve the effectiveness of chemical sensing and monitoring. The multiple sensor cross-check and verification can also ensure system reliability should a sensor fail in the wireless network. In addition, the MWIR/LWIR optical remote sensor network can provide additional information about the chemicals, including their exact location, distribution, dispersion area, and spreading speed. Furthermore, the optical remote sensor network can share information with other wireless sensor networks and form a smart network system that can connect with personal mobile devices.

Existing optical remote chemical sensing technologies include Fourier transform IR spectroscopy,1 tunable laser diode absorption spectroscopy,2 hyperspectral imaging,3 and light detection and ranging.4 These systems show high spectral resolution and sensitivity. However, they are bulky, heavy, expensive, and not suitable for portable and wireless optical remote chemical sensor networks.

We have developed a miniature wireless optical remote sensor network that includes a multispectral MWIR/LWIR quantum-dot IR photodetector (QDIP) with on-chip integrated plasmonic filters and wireless sensor network connections (see Figure 1).5 Our system consists of MWIR/LWIR optical remote sensors (a sensor box is shown in the picture), a central wireless receiver, and a computer for sensor signal display and chemical identification and analysis. The sensors communicate with the central receiver through wireless connection.

Figure 1. The wireless mid-wave/long-wave IR optical remote sensor system, comprising wireless optical remote sensors, a central receiver, and a central computer for sensor signal display and chemical identification and analysis. The sensors communicate with the central receiver through a wireless network. ZnSe: Zinc selenide.

The multispectral sensor chip consists of nine QDIPs. One is a reference photodetector, and the other eight have integrated plasmonic filters with different passbands for spectral filtering. The reference photodetector can detect the variation of the background radiation and provide adjustment for the measurement of the other photodetectors. All the plasmonic filters can be fabricated on the QDIPs in a single fabrication step, which significantly reduces the fabrication cost of plasmonic filters. We can incorporate more QDIPs with plasmonic filters in the sensor chip to increase the spectral resolution of the optical remote sensor. The multispectral QDIPs are low-cost MWIR/LWIR detectors, with a high operating temperature (HOT).6 The HOT QDIP enables thermal-electric (TE) cooled chemical sensing and thus can avoid bulky, heavy, and power-hungry cryogenic cooling systems. Such TE cooled optical remote sensors can significantly reduce size, weight, and power consumption (SWaP).

By measuring the signals of the QDIPs, we can determine the absorption at these wavelengths, and by comparing these results with the signature absorptions of chemicals, we can identify the chemicals and determine their concentration.

In summary, the integrated plasmonic filters and the HOT QDIPs enable compact optical remote chemical sensors with low cost and significantly reduced SWaP. The wireless sensor network approach can significantly improve the effectiveness of optical remote chemical sensing and monitoring, including coverage area, accuracy, and reliability. In future, we will focus on applying the sensors to take measurements of carbon-based trace gases (carbon dioxide, methane, and carbon monoxide) in the atmosphere for air pollution monitoring, as well as for chemical leak detection, and for explosive detection at security checkpoints.

Xuejun Lu
University of Massachusetts Lowell
Lowell, MA

Xuejun Lu is a professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. His research interests include MWIR/LWIR photodetectors, focal plane arrays, and plasmonics. He is also a co-founder of Applied NanoFemto Technologies LLC.

Jarrod Vaillancourt
Applied NanoFemto Technologies LLC
Lowell, MA

1. Y. Lu, D. Zhao, S. Fan, L. Duan, A 4-hydroxynaphthalimide-derived ratiometric fluorescent probe for hydrazine and its in vivo applications, Sens. Actuat. B 36, p. 517-521, 1996.
2. P. Werle, R. Mücke, F. Slemr, The limits of signal averaging in atmospheric trace-gas monitoring by tunable diode-laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS), Appl. Phys. B 57, p. 131-139, 1993.
3. V. Farley, A. Vallières, A. Villemaire, M. Chamberland, P. Lagueux, J. Giroux, Chemical agent detection and identification with a hyperspectral imaging infrared sensor, Proc. SPIE 6739, p. 673918, 2007. doi:10.1117/12.736864
4. C. Carlisle, CO2 laser-based differential absorption lidar system for range-resolved and long-range detection of chemical vapor plumes, Appl. Opt. 34, p. 6187-6200, 1995.
5. X. Lu, J. N. Vaillancourt, Miniature multispectral quantum-dot infrared photodetector for optical remote chemical sensing. Presented at SPIE Photonics West 2016.
6. J. Vaillancourt, P. Vasinajindakaw, W. Hong, X. Lu, X. Qian, S. R. Vangala, W. D. Goodhue, A LWIR quantum dot infrared photodetector working at 298K, Proc. SPIE 7608, p. 760821, 2010. doi:10.1117/12.847081