SPIE Membership Get updates from SPIE Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
  • Astronomy
  • Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
  • Defense & Security
  • Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
  • Illumination & Displays
  • Lasers & Sources
  • Micro/Nano Lithography
  • Nanotechnology
  • Optical Design & Engineering
  • Optoelectronics & Communications
  • Remote Sensing
  • Sensing & Measurement
  • Solar & Alternative Energy
  • Sign up for Newsroom E-Alerts
  • Information for:
SPIE Photonics West 2018 | Call for Papers




Print PageEmail PageView PDF

Illumination & Displays

Instantaneous generation of spatial diversity for speckle contrast reduction

Adapted refractive steppers are used to reduce the speckle contrast of a laser beam after determination of its coherence length and periodicity function.

3 December 2015, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1201511.006197

When a laser is used as an illumination source, the shape of its light is influenced by the well-known ‘speckle effect.’ Speckle is a visible effect of light interference and directly depends on the coherence length of the laser. In some dedicated studies, speckled and unspeckled images were presented to a human operator.1 These cases highlighted and were used to quantify the strong impact of speckle on detection, reconnaissance, and identification ranges. Although speckle contains useful information on the phase of the illuminating light, for intensity-based recordings speckle appears to be a problem. Speckle can therefore be a major drawback on active imaging performance, and it is necessary to find ways to counter its effects.

Purchase SPIE Field Guide to IlluminationAccording to Goodman's theory of speckle reduction,2 speckle contrast is reduced by a factor of (where m denotes uncorrelated speckle patterns). If the integration time of the image recording is sufficiently long, a multiple frame addition technique3 can be an efficient way to reduce the speckle contrast (see Figure 1). However, for fast-moving targets, or for low repetition rate high-energy pulsed lasers, this approach is not possible. The coherence length of a laser source cannot be modified without alteration of the laser parameters. Only ‘extra cavity actions’ can thus be used to change the amount of speckle. Several different parameters, including wavelength,4 polarization,5 angular diversity,6 and spatial diversity7 can be used in speckle reduction techniques.

Figure 1. Images of the same scene recorded in an accumulation mode (left) and a flash mode (right). When the integration time is sufficiently long, multiple frame addition can be an efficient way to reduce the speckle contrast.

In this work, we present a complete method for decreasing speckle contrast involved with laser illumination by increasing the spatial diversity of coherent laser sources.8 For very short laser pulses, spatial diversity occurs instantaneously and no time average effect can be used. The spatial diversity is therefore realized by sampling the laser beam as m beamlets, with increasing optical path lengths. The path length must be greater than, or equal to, the coherence length of the laser beam. To achieve this spatial diversity, we use refractive steppers (see Figure 2). These offer many advantages (e.g., conservation of brightness, low cost, and easy handling) over other approaches.

Figure 2. Top: Illustration of how laser spatial diversity can be generated by a stepper element. Bottom: An adapted refractive stepper element fabricated from optical-grade diamond-turning polymethylmethacrylate.

To obtain m uncorrelated beamlets, we have designed our refractive steppers according to several parameters. First, we calculate the step thickness (e) from the coherence length ( lc) of the laser source and from the index of refraction of the transparent medium. Second, we define the number of steps (m) in the steppers by a periodicity function that depends on the laser cavity length (L). Lastly, we ensure that each beamlet has the same power. This corresponds to the total laser power, distributed over all m beamlets. We assume that there is a constant intensity of light (i) incident to the stepper and therefore each of its rings must have the same surface. With these design constraints, the expected speckle contrast reduction (SC) from our steppers is equal to


For our speckle contrast analysis, we used a slightly modified Michelson interferometer to directly determine e. In this experiment we slightly tilted the alignment of both arms so that two beams from the same source overlapped, but so that we avoided the formation of fringes. We then used a high-resolution camera to record the speckle contrast (see Figure 3). We moved the mobile arm to produce a path difference (Δx) until the speckle contrast dropped to a value of . At this point, we consider the two beams to be uncorrelated. As Δx increases, the speckle contrast value remains constant. When Δx is equal to 2L, however, the speckle contrast reaches its maximum value (corresponding to a periodicity function).9 From this value we can calculate the maximum number of steps that will produce truly uncorrelated beamlets.

Figure 3. Illustration of the speckle contrast measurement Michelson experiment setup. Δx: Path difference. SC: Speckle contrast. lc: Laser coherence length. L: Laser cavity length.

We have performed an experimental recording with a red-emitting (660nm) continuous-wave single-emitter laser diode and an adapted stepper element that we fabricated from optical-grade diamond-turning polymethylmethacrylate (as shown in Figure 2). The results from this experiment are shown in Figure 4(a), in which the periodicity function of the laser can be observed. From our recorded values we are able to calculate both the coherence length (2 × 10−3m) and the cavity length (6.25 × 10−3m) of the laser. When we apply the relation that gives the number of beamlets, we deduce that we can generate six fully uncorrelated beamlets. This corresponds to a maximum speckle contrast reduction of 59%. Our recorded speckle contrast results are shown as a function of the number of steps in Figure 4(b). We see that the experimental curve follows the theoretical values that are given by Goodman's theory. For higher values, however, the curve reaches a saturation limit that corresponds to the periodicity function of this laser.

Figure 4. (a) Speckle contrast recorded from a red-emitting continuous-wave single-emitter laser diode. The experimental results are shown as a function of the path difference. (b) The speckle contrast results shown as a function of the number of steps in the adapted refractive stepper.

We have presented and experimentally validated a methodology for speckle reduction of laser illuminators, which is based on spatial diversity. We analyze the beam from the laser to determine both its coherence length and periodicity function. When we place the corresponding refractive stepper in the laser beam, an instantaneous speckle contrast reduction occurs. We are thus able to achieve an efficient, compact, low-cost, and easy-to-align solution for speckle reduction. In the next stages of our work we will apply this validated method to reduce the speckle contrast of a high-energy pulsed optical parametric oscillator laser, which we use in our active imaging applications.6

Yves Lutz
French-German Research Institute of Saint-Louis
Saint-Louis, France

Yves Lutz received his MSc and PhD in laser physics from the University of Franche-Comté and the University of Haute-Alsace (both in France), respectively. He specializes in the development of laser sources and laser illumination devices.

1. R. G. Driggers, R. H. Vollmerhausen, N. Devitt, C. Halford, K. J. Barnard, Impact of speckle on laser range-gated shortwave infrared imaging system target identification performance, Opt. Eng. 42, p. 738-746, 2003. doi:10.1117/1.1543159
2. J. W. Goodman, Some fundamental properties of speckle, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, p. 1145-1150, 1976.
3. F. Christnacher, M. Laurenzis, S. Schertzer, Theoretical and experimental comparison of flash and accumulation mode in range-gated active imaging, Opt. Eng. 53, p. 043106, 2014. doi:10.1117/1.OE.53.4.043106
4. B. Göhler, P. Lutzmann, G. Anstett, 3D imaging with range gated laser systems using speckle reduction techniques to improve the depth accuracy, Proc. SPIE 7113, p. 711307, 2008. doi:10.1117/12.799740
5. J. I. Trisdani, Speckle contrast reduction in laser projection displays, Proc. SPIE 4657, p. 131, 2002. doi:10.1117/12.463781
6. M. Laurenzis, Y. Lutz, F. Christnacher, A. Matwyschuk, J. M. Poyet, Homogeneous and speckle-free laser illumination for range-gated imaging and active polarimetry, Opt. Eng. 51, p. 061302, 2012. doi:10.1117/1.OE.51.6.061302
7. S. An, A. Lapchuk, V. Yurlov, J. Song, H.-W. Park, J. Jang, W. Shin, S. Kargapoltsev, S. K. Yun, Speckle suppression in laser display using several partially coherent beams, Opt. Express 17, p. 92-103, 2009.
8. Y. Lutz, J.-M. Poyet, Methodology for the conception of speckle reduction elements in the case of short pulse illumination, Proc. SPIE 9649, p. 96490L, 2015. doi:10.1117/12.2193744
9. W. Koechner, Solid-State Laser Engineering, p. 750, Springer, 2006.