SPIE Startup Challenge 2015 Founding Partner - JENOPTIK Get updates from SPIE Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
  • Astronomy
  • Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
  • Defense & Security
  • Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
  • Illumination & Displays
  • Lasers & Sources
  • Micro/Nano Lithography
  • Nanotechnology
  • Optical Design & Engineering
  • Optoelectronics & Communications
  • Remote Sensing
  • Sensing & Measurement
  • Solar & Alternative Energy
  • Sign up for Newsroom E-Alerts
  • Information for:
    Advertisers
SPIE Photonics West 2017 | Register Today

SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing 2017 | Call for Papers

2017 SPIE Optics + Photonics | Call for Papers

Get Down (loaded) - SPIE Journals OPEN ACCESS

SPIE PRESS




Print PageEmail PageView PDF

Illumination & Displays

Inkjet printing equipment for organic LED mass production

Progress in inkjet printing technology could enable low-cost mass production of large-size organic LED panels.
17 July 2015, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1201506.005940

The organic LED (OLED) display market has grown rapidly in recent years, largely due to the adoption of OLED for small-size mobile products. New advances in the development of ultra-thin and flexible OLED displays have further expanded the opportunity for OLEDs in mobile applications.

However, OLEDs have yet to achieve widespread commercial success in the large-size display market because volume-manufacturing costs remain prohibitive. Today's large-size OLED panels primarily use vacuum-based coating to deposit the active organic films that make up each emissive OLED pixel. Ideally, OLED displays are made using repeating arrays of individually patterned red, green, and blue (RGB) subpixels. This is the simplest device structure with the best overall display performance.

It is possible to fabricate such a display using a so-called fine metal mask (FMM) to achieve patterned RGB coatings of the OLED active materials,1, 2 but material efficiency, scalability, and yield are not acceptable for mass production of large-size displays. As a result, existing large-size products use an alternative technique where an unpatterned white-emitting OLED structure is combined with conventional RGB color filters.3,4 However, this approach requires a more complex architecture (adding to cost), and the resulting displays have lower overall performance than true RGB-patterned OLED displays. Even in a high-volume, high-yield mass-production line, this approach will not deliver a product that is cost-competitive with LCDs.

Since the late 1990s, inkjet printing has been explored by many groups to address the OLED cost-competitiveness problem.5, 6 The goal is to develop a low-cost method of manufacturing true RGB OLED displays without the difficulties of vacuum-based FMM processing. Inkjet was a logical candidate because this technology can deliver highly scalable, pattern-wise precision deposition of organic thin films with high material efficiency. Making inkjet successful, however, requires good inkjet equipment and good solution-processable OLED materials.

Historically, two challenges have impeded the adoption of inkjet printing for OLED mass production. First, device performance (color, efficiency, and lifetime) failed to reach the standard required for display commercialization due to intrinsic material limitations and the use of wet processing. Second, inkjet OLED panels suffered from visual nonuniformities, in particular, a type of pattern nonuniformity referred to as ‘mura.’ Mura is caused by imperfect inkjet droplet deposition onto the panel substrate and nonuniform ink drying over the substrate surface.

Lately, the intrinsic performance of wet-processed inkjet printable materials has improved dramatically7–13 and has reached the level necessary to transition inkjet into mass production. In addition, progress in inkjet technology has resulted in the demonstration of large-size, uniform, mura-free panels.14,15 This progress has made inkjet a realistic near-term solution to enable low-cost mass production of large-size OLED panels. However, the transition from research and development to mass production is difficult, especially for inkjet equipment.

Between 2008 and 2013, we at Kateeva developed the first commercial inkjet technology engineered from the ground up for OLED mass production—the YIELDjet™ (see Figures 1 and 2)—and our mass-production tools are now operating in the field.


Figure 1. Kateeva YIELDjet™ inkjet technology.

Figure 2. Close-up of inkjet head array showing three packs of three printheads on an existing YIELDjet mass-production system.

In addition to the baseline requirements of a precision inkjet-printing system, the technology has three key characteristics. First, it is engineered to enable very low substrate particle contamination. This is achieved through the systematic application of semiconductor equipment design principles to each component of the system, and also through the careful design of gas flow within the system to minimize turbulence.

Second, the technology uses a production-worthy integrated ultrapure nitrogen processing environment. Given the sensitivity of OLEDs to ambient contaminants such as oxygen and moisture, this critical feature maximizes OLED performance, especially device lifetime. The challenge was to provide a high-purity N2 environment while maintaining production worthiness. We accomplished this through a ground-up design of the inkjet machine architecture to ensure that the system can be routinely serviced without exposure to air, and that in rare cases of air exposure, clean nitrogen is directed and purged through all system components to sweep away residual air, enabling a remarkably short recovery time.

Third, the system uses advanced inkjet printing algorithms and process monitoring to provide consistent, uniform, mura-free film deposition with a wide process window. This means that in production, the panels consistently meet specification. This contrasts with the typical research and development environment, where it is sufficient to demonstrate a small number of high-quality samples and near-perfect repeatability is not required.

To achieve such reliability, we have developed several key innovations. Specifically, we developed a novel in-flight inkjet droplet monitoring technology that is 50 times faster than previous techniques. This technology uses laser reflection and interference to perform highly accurate in situ measurements for each nozzle of droplet volume, velocity, and trajectory—key parameters needed to control and calibrate the print algorithm—at rates that for the first time are compatible with high-volume manufacturing. We have also developed a unique print engine, advanced printing uniformity algorithms, and novel drive electronics. Combined, these technologies enable sustained, on-the-fly adaptation of the printing process based on continuous measurements of nozzle status with feedback to the print engine, resulting in high uniformity and repeatability, and requiring minimum down time for tool recalibration and tuning.16

Today, inkjet printing is already enabling OLED thin-film encapsulation (TFE), key technology required for manufacturing ultra-thin and flexible OLED screens. Companies using inkjet for TFE OLED mass production are attracted by the high coating quality, as well as the cost-of-ownership advantages over competing technologies. With recent advancements in material quality and equipment technology, as described here, inkjet printing for RGB pixel patterning is now poised to follow the same path as TFE into OLED mass production to enable manufacturing of cost-effective large-size OLED displays. As our next step, we are scaling up and incorporating these technologies into our forthcoming G8 glass (i.e., glass plates large enough to process six 55" TV panels on one plate) RGB mass production systems for high-volume, low-cost manufacturing of large-size OLED displays.


Conor Madigan, Steve Van Slyke, Eli Vronsky
Kateeva Inc.
Menlo Park, CA

Conor Madigan is president and co-founder of Kateeva. Before Kateeva he was a post-doctoral research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and has worked on organic electronic device technology for 15 years. He earned a BScE from Princeton and an MSc and PhD from MIT, all in electrical engineering.

Steve Van Slyke is CTO of Kateeva. He co-invented the OLED technology at Eastman Kodak, where he held a variety of positions during 30-year career focusing on OLED development. He received a BA in chemistry from Ithaca College and an MSc in materials science from Rochester Institute of Technology.

Eli Vronsky is executive vice president of product development at Kateeva. Before Kateeva he spent two decades developing high-performance industrial printing systems in leadership positions at PixDro Ltd. (CEO), at Aprion Digital (vice president), and at Scitex Corporation (vice president). He received a BSc from Tel Aviv University.


References:
1. J. W. Hamer, A. Yamamoto, G. Rajeswaran, S. A. Van Slyke, Mass production of full-color AMOLED displays, SID Symp. Digest Tech. Papers 36, p. 1902, 2005.
2. T. Sasaoka, M. Sekiya, A. Yumoto, J. Yamada, T. Hirano, Y. Iwase, T. Yamada, et al., A 13.0-inch AM-OLED display with top emitting structure and adaptive current mode programmed pixel circuit (TAC), SID Symp. Digest Tech. Papers 32, p. 384, 2001.
3. A. D. Arnold, T. K. Hatwar, M. V. Hettel, P. J. Kane, M. E. Miller, M. J. Murdoch, J. P. Spindler, et al., Full-color AMOLED with RGBW pixel pattern, Proc. 24th Int'l Display Res. Conf., p. 808, 2004.
4. C.-H. Oh, H.-J. Shin, W.-J. Nam, B.-C. Ahn, S.-Y. Cha, S.-D. Yeo, Technological progress and commercialization of OLED TV, SID Symp. Digest Tech. Papers 44, p. 239, 2013.
5. T. Shimoda, S. Kanbe, H. Kobayashi, S. Seki, H. Kiguchi, I. Yudasaka, M. Kimura, S. Miyashita, R. H. Friend, J. H. Burroughes, C. R. Towns, Multicolor pixel patterning of light-emitting polymers by ink-jet printing, SID Symp. Digest Tech. Papers 30, p. 376, 1999.
6. M. Fleuster, M. Klein, P. V. Roosmalen, A. D. Wit, H. Schwab, Mass manufacturing of full color passive-matrix and active-matrix PLED displays, SID Symp. Digest Tech. Papers 35, p. 1276, 2004.
7. N. Herron, W. Gao, Advanced materials for printed OLED displays, SID Symp. Digest Tech. Papers 41, p. 469, 2010.
8. M. Roberts, S. King, M. Cass, M. Pintani, C. Coward, N. Akino, H. Nakajima, M. Anryu, Excited state interactions in P-OLEDs: implications for efficiency and lifetime, SID Symp. Digest Tech. Papers 42, p. 820, 2011.
9. S. Xia, K.-O. Cheon, J. J. Brooks, M. Rothman, T. Ngo, P. Hett, R. C. Kwong, et al., Printable phosphorescent organic light-emitting devices, J. Soc. Info. Display 17(2), p. 167, 2009.
10. A. Hayer, R. Anémian, T. Eberle, S. Heun, A. Ludemann, N. Schulte, H. Buchholz, Concepts for solution-processable OLED materials at Merck, J. Info. Display 12(1), p. 57, 2011.
11. I. Ogawa, PLEDs, flexible displays and printed electronics, OLEDs World Summit, 2014.
12. M. Ricks, Soluble systems---closing the gap with evaporable OLED materials, Printed Electron. Conf., 2013.
13. D. Flattery, DuPont updates us on their OLED advances, sees printed OLED TVs soon, OLED-Info, 2015. http://www.oled-info.com/dupont-updates-us-their-oled-advances-sees-printed-oled-tvs-soon
14. http://news.panasonic.com/press/news/official.data/data.dir/2013/01/en130109-3/en130109-3.html#r=s Panasonic develops 56-inch 4k2k OLED panel, Panasonic Newsroom Global, 9 January 2013. Accessed 25 June 2015
15. P.-Y. Chen, C.-L. Chen, C.-C. Chen, L. Tsai, H.-C. Ting, L.-F. Lin, C.-C. Chen, et al., 65-Inch inkjet printed organic light-emitting display panel with high degree of pixel uniformity, SID Symp. Digest Tech. Papers 45, p. 396, 2014.
16. C. F. Madigan, C. R. Hauf, L. D. Barkley, N. Harjee, E. Vronsky, S. A. Van Slyke, Advancements in inkjet printing for OLED mass production, SID Symp. Digest Tech. Papers 45, p. 399, 2014.