- Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
- Defense & Security
- Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
- Illumination & Displays
- Lasers & Sources
- Micro/Nano Lithography
- Optical Design & Engineering
- Optoelectronics & Communications
- Remote Sensing
- Sensing & Measurement
- Solar & Alternative Energy
- Sign up for Newsroom E-Alerts
- Information for:
Solar & Alternative Energy
Structural origins of open-circuit voltage tunability in ternary-blend solar cells
Chemical compatibility between constituents of the active layer in bulk heterojunction solar cells affects its morphology, which in turn correlates with open-circuit voltage tunability.
2 March 2015, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1201502.005789
Solution-processable polymer solar cells comprising active layers with two components have reached power conversion efficiencies close to 10%, providing an attractive route for converting sunlight into electricity. Importantly, these values are approaching the predicted practical efficiency limit for single-layer two-component bulk-heterojunction (BHJ) polymer solar cells.1 The efficiency limit can be pushed to 14–15% through the use of a tandem architecture in which two absorbing layers are connected in series or parallel.1 This structure, however, requires additional and more complicated processing steps. BHJ polymer solar cells having three-component active layers (either two donors and one acceptor or one donor and two acceptors) provide an alternative approach toward higher efficiencies and preserve the simplicity of active-layer fabrication in a single processing step.2
Until 2011, efficiency enhancements in ternary-blend BHJ solar cells were only achieved by broadening the absorption spectrum by using constituents with complementary absorption profiles. Until then, it was believed that the open-circuit voltage (VOC) in these solar cells would be pinned by the lower of the two energy levels associated with the highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMOs) of the two polymer donors.3 Thompson and colleagues demonstrated that, with judicious selection of donor and acceptor constituents, the VOC can—to the contrary—be tuned between the effective HOMO energy level of the polymer donors and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy level of the electron acceptor without negatively affecting other solar-cell output parameters.4, 5 An organic alloy model6 that describes the origin of this tunability necessitates strong electronic interactions between the constituents for the device VOC to depend on the composition in the active layer.7
We have obtained the first direct structural evidence supporting this organic alloy model through grazing-incidence x-ray diffraction (GIXD) measurements on two ternary blends. When these blends are incorporated into functional solar cells, one shows invariant VOC (blend A) while the other shows tunable VOC with composition (blend B). Figure 1 shows the percentage change in the d-spacing of one of the constituent polymer donors for these two ternary blends as a function of composition. The d-spacing of the polymer donor is invariant with composition in blend A, indicating that the crystalline structure of the polymer donor is not affected by changes in composition within the ternary blend. This indicates that little, if any, mixing occurs at the nanoscale, as altering the composition of the blend does not impact the crystalline structure of the polymer donor in question.
Figure 1. Percentage change in characteristic spacing (blue, filled shapes) of the crystallites of the polymer donor in blends A and B, illustrating pinned VOC (blend A) and variable VOC with composition (blend B) (black, open shapes).
Consistent with the organic alloy model, devices comprising blend A show an invariant VOC that is dictated by the lower energy level of the HOMOs of the two polymer donors. In contrast, our data on blend B in Figure 1 reveals that the d-spacing of the polymer donor being tracked changes continuously with blend composition. This decrease in d-spacing indicates a continuous change in the nanoscale crystalline structure of the polymer donor as it accommodates the gradual addition of the third constituent in the ternary blend. As such, we interpret the decrease in d-spacing as indirect evidence for intimate mixing of the two polymer donors in blend B. Devices comprising blend B show VOC that can be correspondingly tuned with the composition of the active layer.
In summary, our structural characterization reveals that intimate mixing of the constituents in ternary-blend active layers is critical for VOC tunability. While the constituents need not form well-defined co-crystals, they need to be chemically compatible for this mixing at the nanoscale to take place. To this end, our findings implicate surface energy differences (the difference of the square is proportional to chemical compatibility) as a solid predictor of VOC tunability. We are developing new design principles for next-generation materials systems that can lead to easily processable devices having high short-circuit current densities without sacrificing the open-circuit voltage.
We thank Barry C. Thompson and Andrey E. Rudenko at the University of Southern California for supplying the polymers. GIXD experiments were conducted at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source. We acknowledge funding from the National Science Foundation (DMR-1035217 and DMR-0819860) and the Office of Naval Research (N00014-11-10328).
Yueh-Lin Loo, Petr P. Khlyabich
Yueh-Lin Loo (Lynn) is Theodora D. '78 and William H. Walton III '74 Professor in Engineering at Princeton University. Her research emphasis is the structural development of complex materials for plastic circuits and solar cells. She received her PhD from Princeton in 2001.
Petr P. Khlyabich is a postdoctoral research associate. His research focus is on processing-structure-function relationships in organic and organometal halides for next-generation photovoltaics.
1. R. A. J. Janssen, J. Nelson, Factors limiting device efficiency in organic photovoltaics, Adv. Mater.
25(13), p. 1847-1858, 2013. doi:10.1002/adma.201202873
2. P. P. Khlyabich, B. Burkhart, A. E. Rudenko, B. C. Thompson, Optimization and simplification of polymer-fullerene solar cells through polymer and active layer design, Polymer
54(20), p. 5267-5298, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2013.07.053
3. M. Koppe, H.-J. Egelhaaf, G. Dennler, M. C. Scharber, C. J. Brabec, P. Schilinsky, C. N. Hoth, Near IR sensitization of organic bulk heterojunction solar cells: towards optimization of the spectral response of organic solar cells, Adv. Funct. Mater.
20(2), p. 338-346, 2010. doi:10.1002/adfm.200901473
4. P. P. Khlyabich, B. Burkhart, B. C. Thompson, Efficient ternary blend bulk heterojunction solar cells with tunable open-circuit voltage, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
133(37), p. 14534-14537, 2011. doi:10.1021/ja205977z
5. P. P. Khlyabich, B. Burkhart, B. C. Thompson, Compositional dependence of the open-circuit voltage in ternary blend bulk heterojunction solar cells based on two donor polymers, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
134(22), p. 9074-9077, 2012. doi:10.1021/ja302935n
6. R. A. Street, D. Davies, P. P. Khlyabich, B. Burkhart, B. C. Thompson, Origin of the tunable open-circuit voltage in ternary blend bulk heterojunction organic solar cells, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
135(3), p. 986-989, 2013. doi:10.1021/ja3112143
7. P. P. Khlyabich, A. E. Rudenko, R. A. Street, B. C. Thompson, Influence of polymer compatibility on the open-circuit voltage in ternary blend bulk heterojunction solar cells, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
6(13), p. 9913-9919, 2014. doi:10.1021/am502122a