SPIE Startup Challenge 2015 Founding Partner - JENOPTIK Get updates from SPIE Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
  • Astronomy
  • Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
  • Defense & Security
  • Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
  • Illumination & Displays
  • Lasers & Sources
  • Micro/Nano Lithography
  • Nanotechnology
  • Optical Design & Engineering
  • Optoelectronics & Communications
  • Remote Sensing
  • Sensing & Measurement
  • Solar & Alternative Energy
  • Sign up for Newsroom E-Alerts
  • Information for:

SPIE Photonics West 2017 | Register Today

SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing 2017 | Call for Papers

Get Down (loaded) - SPIE Journals OPEN ACCESS


Print PageEmail PageView PDF

Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging

Electronic contact lenses may replace reading glasses

Electronic contact lenses can switch between different focal powers, functioning similarly to putting on and taking off reading glasses.
19 January 2015, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1201501.005746

A leading problem facing modern optometry is correcting presbyopia, the reduction of near-visual acuity arising from the natural deterioration of the eyes' accommodation mechanism. It affects everyone over age 45. This deterioration is thought to arise from a reduction in the crystalline lens' flexibility that renders the aging eye unable to provide the additional focal power for near-vision tasks. The most common form of correction for presbyopia is wearing a pair of reading glasses for near-vision tasks. Contact lens correction of presbyopia is more problematic due to the fundamental restrictions caused by various forms of optical compromise associated with simultaneous vision devices. This results in reduced vision quality and user satisfaction.1

Purchase SPIE Field Guide to MicroscopyCurrently, correcting presbyopia with contact lenses relies on a concept known as simultaneous vision, with a single contact lens possessing multiple regions of different corrective power. Simultaneous vision contact lenses provide both focused and unfocused images on the retina. The brain's visual system is required to select the correct image and ignore out-of-focus information. This process can result in reduced visual acuity and contrast sensitivity and is a major area of contact lens research and development. We are researching a new correction method that uses electro-active liquid-crystal lenses and avoids the visual compromises associated with current technology.2, 3 Liquid-crystal lenses can be turned on and off electronically and show great promise for recreating the accommodation mechanism of the crystalline lens.

Liquid crystals are a state of matter between a solid and a liquid, and are best known for their use in flat-screen displays. Liquid crystals generally form from long, rodlike molecules that exhibit some degree of orientational order, but with no or limited positional order. The long molecules tend to point in the same direction, be it dictated by surfaces or applied electric fields. The principle behind liquid-crystal devices is the phenomenon that occurs when a voltage is applied to a liquid-crystal material, reorienting the liquid crystal. This reorientation corresponds to a change in the material's refractive index, a property that can be exploited to form a variable-focus lens.4, 5 A prototype pair of spectacle lenses using liquid-crystal lens technology was developed at the University of Arizona.6

Our work on these new contact lenses is being conducted in a collaborative research project between university departments and industry. Our primary goal is to transfer liquid-crystal lens technology to contact lens use. Contact lenses have a unique set of requirements. First, the lens device must be able to be placed on the cornea and constructed using contact lens materials, thus deviating from the commonly used flat glass commercial devices. In terms of required optics, a contact lens device correcting for presbyopia cannot have additional optical power when it is turned off. It must also be capable of providing up to +2.00 diopters (D) of optical power when activated. Finally, the device must be thin enough to be used as a contact lens. A thickness of less than 300 microns is preferred.

Figure 1 shows our prototype device, which was designed to meet all of these criteria using a balanced optical system, with the substrates consisting of two positive meniscus polymethyl methacrylate contact lenses. The interior curvatures of the substrates were designed to produce a cavity shaped like a negative meniscus lens so it can be filled with a liquid crystal. The general principle of action is the change of refractive index of the liquid-crystal layer with the applied voltage across the cavity. In the electrically inactive state, the optical power from the lens substrates and the liquid-crystal layer are opposite and equal, resulting in a net optical power of zero. When a sufficiently high voltage is applied to the lens device, the refractive index of the liquid-crystal layer is reduced, converging optical power from the substrates dominating the system and inducing a positive net optical power for the device. We designed the device to provide a change of +2.00 D in optical power when activated, perfect for correcting most forms of presbyopia, though higher optical powers are readily achievable if needed.

Figure 1. A prototype liquid-crystal contact lens. Voltage is applied via connections wired to a flat ring around the optical region in the center.

We fabricated the substrates using standard contact lens manufacturing techniques, with a conductive transparent coating of indium tin oxide sputtered onto the interior surfaces of the lens device. We also treated the interior surfaces with an alignment agent and then filled the cavity containing the liquid crystal. The potential change in refractive index is 0.18, a level that is typical for commonly used liquid-crystal materials employed in displays. Upon applying a voltage above the threshold voltage of the liquid crystal (typically ∼4V is used to provide a large change in the refractive index appropriate for optical switching), an additional +2.00 D can be induced (see Figure 2). In terms of the device's optical quality, the point spread function and modulation transfer function (MTF) indicate that the optical quality of empty devices and those filled with liquid crystal are similar (typically MTF50, a standard measure of the lens' resolving power, which is the cut-off spatial frequency at 50% modulation and relevant to vision correction). Values can vary between 60 and 70% of the diffraction limit in these devices. The switching is different from that of usual display devices due to the non-uniform thickness. Initially, defects form, resulting in an intermediate transitory scattering state when switching between focuses (see Figure 3). These defects disappear after a short time. We have significantly improved the device switching time using higher voltages and thinner devices, as well as different liquid-crystal materials.7

Figure 2. The response of the prototype lens with respect to applied voltage, with an additional power of +2.00 diopters (D) induced upon voltages in excess of 3.5V. The dashed lines indicate the desired range of induced focal power. Vrms: Voltage root mean square.

Figure 3. A light bulb filament being brought into focus by the prototype device. (a) The image is initially out of focus. (b) The intermediate transient state before (c) the filament is brought into sharp focus.

Our technology promises to address one of the most problematic issues in modern optometry, the correction of presbyopia using contact lenses. In conclusion, we fabricated an electronically controllable liquid-crystal contact lens and showed it can change in the optical power required for presbyopia correction as well as meet the practical requirements for a viable contact-lens device. Our current work has made considerable progress in prototype devices and addressed some of the fundamental issues, such as polarization dependence of the lenses. We have also optimized the materials and created new designs and processes to improve construction and optical performance. We are conducting further work to move the powering and operation of the device away from wired connections, including construction of self-contained wireless devices with microelectronics operating at radio frequencies.8, 9

This work is a collaboration between academics in optometry led by Philip Morgan, Fellow of the American Academy of Optometry, and the School of Physics and Astronomy, led by Helen Gleeson, OBE, and Cliff Jones, Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering, with two full-time researchers working on the project, Harry Milton, PhD, and Sarabjot Kaur, PhD. In addition, contact lens manufacturer and distributor UltraVision CLPL provided commercial support.

Harry Milton, Sarabjot Kaur, Cliff Jones, Philip Morgan, Helen Gleeson
School of Physics and Astronomy
University of Manchester
Manchester, UK

Harry Milton, PhD, is a research associate who has spent over five years designing and building new electronically controlled contact lenses and fabricating optical liquid-crystal devices.

1. W. N. Charman, Restoring accommodation: a dream or an approaching reality?, Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 25(1), p. 1-6, 2005.
2. H. E. Milton, P. B. Morgan, J. H. Clamp, H. F. Gleeson, Electronic liquid-crystal contact lenses for the correction of presbyopia, Opt. Express 22, p. 8035-8040, 2014.
3. H. E. Milton, H. F. Gleeson, P. B. Morgan, J. W. Goodby, S. Cowling, J. H. Clamp, Switchable liquid-crystal contact lenses: dynamic vision for the ageing eye, Proc. SPIE 9004, p. 90040H, 2014. doi:10.1117/12.2044676
4. S. Sato, Liquid-crystal lens-cells with variable focal length, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 18, p. 1679-1684, 1979.
5. M. Ye, S. Sato, Optical properties of liquid crystal lens of any size, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 41, Part 2(5B), p. L571-L573, 2002.
6. G. Li, D. L. Mathine, P. Valley, P. Äyräs, J. N. Haddock, M. S. Giridhar, et al., Switchable electro-optic diffractive lens with high efficiency for ophthalmic applications, Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 103, p. 6100-6104, 2006.
7. H. E. Milton, M. Nagaraj, S. Kaur, J. C. Jones, P. B. Morgan, H. F. Gleeson, Field-induced refractive index variation in the dark conglomerate phase for polarization-independent switchable liquid-crystal lenses, Appl. Opt. 53, p. 7278-7284, 2014.
8. J. De Smet, A. Avci, P. Joshi, D. Schaubroeck, D. Cuypers, H. De smet, Progress toward a liquid-crystal contact lens display, J. Soc. Inf. Display 21, p. 399-406, 2013.
9. A. R. Lingley, M. Ali, Y. Liao, R. Mirjalili, M. Klonner, M. Sopanen, et al., A single-pixel wireless contact lens display, J. Micromechan. Microeng. 21, p. 125014, 2011.